A key point of contention was whether the proposed development required a “D-variance,” given its potential change in use from a historically significant single-family dwelling to a multi-unit structure. The Burn Bray Inn, with its history as part of a former summer resort town, stands as a symbol of Sparta’s transformation into a rural suburb. A board member emphasized the need for clarity on zoning laws, noting, “I just don’t feel like I know what we’re voting on,” highlighting the ambiguities surrounding the application and the necessity for more plans before making a decision.

The debate over the proposed development was intensified by the public’s strong opposition. Anthony Giardullo, president of the Glen Lake Beach Association, voiced concerns about the fundamental change in use implied by the application. He argued that granting a D-variance would alter the property’s character, emphasizing safety concerns due to a proposed dumpster area that could attract wildlife, particularly bears, given its proximity to the beach. Giardullo underscored the historical significance of the property, citing its past associations with notable figures like Thomas Edison, and warned that converting the building into apartments would disrupt the community’s historical and cultural integrity.

Echoing these sentiments, another resident, Glenn Thomas, expressed a preference for the site to remain a single-family home, citing past negative experiences associated with the lodge. He recounted the community’s troubled history with the building, including incidents involving criminal activity, which he argued had left lasting scars on the neighborhood. Thomas appealed to the board, urging them to preserve the community’s tranquility and prevent a return to problematic uses like those previously associated with the lodge. He detailed the lodge’s history of issues, including hosting a Megan’s Law offender and instances of drug activity.

The historical context of the lodge was further highlighted by residents who referred to historical artifacts, such as a postcard from the 1920s, to illustrate the building’s deep-rooted ties to the community’s past. The board was urged to seriously consider these perspectives before making a decision, with residents advocating for preservation over transformation.

The meeting also featured discussions on the existing conditions and future plans for the Glen Lake Road property. A local resident named Glenn provided testimony about the building’s history, mentioning a lack of clarity regarding the number of apartments that existed historically. Following Glenn, Anthony Goddullo, a long-term resident, discussed membership dues associated with the lodge, noting that only two couples primarily resided there, resulting in minimal fees. He expressed concerns about transitioning the structure to accommodate four families and the potential issues that could arise from this change.

As the public comment segment concluded, the board returned to its deliberations, recognizing the need for further clarification on several aspects of the proposal. Inconsistencies in the submitted documents were noted, with discrepancies in measurements, maximum lot coverage, building height, and rear yard setbacks among the concerns raised. The initial plans presented showed five units, contrasting with figures discussed during the meeting, prompting the board to request more detailed architectural renderings and a comprehensive landscape plan.

Board members expressed the necessity of establishing the original use of the property to make an informed decision on the current application. There were mentions of previous resolutions from the 1990s that referenced the building as a hotel. The board ultimately agreed to tentatively schedule a follow-up meeting for August 13, acknowledging the possibility of moving discussions to September if the applicant could not meet the timeline.