A major focus of the meeting was the proposed redevelopment of the Chumsford Mall property, where plans involve constructing two fast-casual restaurants with drive-throughs. The project, spanning five parcels of land including 265-279 Chumsford Street, aims to modernize the existing infrastructure while addressing traffic and environmental issues. The board heard from a traffic engineer who detailed the anticipated impact, noting that the development could generate up to 3,000 daily trips, with half attributed to pass-by traffic already using local roads. Despite these projections, residents expressed skepticism, citing existing congestion and safety concerns. The board acknowledged these issues, planning for a peer review of the traffic study to ensure comprehensive analysis and informed decisions.

Public comments highlighted widespread unease over the neighborhood’s traffic conditions, exacerbated by the proposed development. Residents described frequent congestion on streets like Manahan and Dalton Road, intensified by redirected traffic from nearby Route 495 during peak hours. Concerns about increased traffic, particularly from drive-through services, were voiced by several residents who feared that the development could bring added noise, litter, and safety hazards to the area. Some suggested that the introduction of sit-down restaurants without drive-throughs might mitigate these issues, aligning more closely with the community’s character.

The board also discussed potential zoning changes, including the introduction of the “CB Lite” zoning designation intended to transition certain areas from heavy industrial to ultra-light manufacturing. This proposal aimed to balance industrial needs with residential quality of life, though it prompted debates about its appropriateness near sensitive locations, such as schools and residential zones. Residents questioned the long-term implications of these changes, urging careful consideration of the community’s future land use intentions. Concerns were raised about potential non-conforming statuses for current uses, with residents advocating for zoning that reflects both current and future land needs.

Environmental considerations were another focal point, with residents voicing concerns about stormwater management and the preservation of green spaces. The board discussed plans to reduce impervious surfaces and improve landscaping, with proposals for rain gardens and additional tree plantings to enhance the site’s aesthetic and environmental integrity. These measures aimed to address the community’s concerns about potential flooding and water quality impacts, particularly given the site’s location within a wellhead protection zone.

Throughout the discussions, the board emphasized the importance of engaging with the community to address their concerns and ensure that developments align with Chelmsford’s vision for sustainable growth.