The meeting opened with a detailed examination of the properties located at 16 and Standard Street, represented by Doug Carver. Carver elaborated on the historical context and current utility configurations of the properties, which were originally two cottages before undergoing modifications. He explained that the house at 16 and the cottage at 18 each have separate utilities, complicating matters due to a shared water line setup that arose during basement renovations. Carver expressed concerns about the impracticality of this arrangement, emphasizing the necessity of subdividing the properties to ensure compliance with local bylaws, which typically require one service per lot.

The board showed caution in addressing these subdivision requests. A board member noted that, although the properties have separate addresses and utility bills, they must be officially subdivided before any modifications can be approved. The ongoing moratorium on new water services was discussed, with the board indicating that any alterations to the current setup would require careful consideration. Carver also mentioned a potential buyer’s concerns regarding the current configuration.

The conversation then shifted to the new well project, with updates provided on the first phase of testing. A representative presented favorable water quality results from two test wells, particularly from one labeled TWW4A, which showed an expected flow rate of approximately 650 gallons per minute. Despite minor concerns about a detected compound below regulatory limits, the findings were positive. The board was briefed on the next steps, which include preparing a detailed packet for submission, justifying the selection of this site over other options. The team expressed confidence in the project’s direction, anticipating that the new well would enhance the town’s water supply.

Further discussions included the approval of a document detailing the methodology for conducting a proposed public test well. The narrative covered the project’s history and the zoning examination near the site. No issues were identified, but a “tiny isolated vegetative wetland” was noted near the site. Although not state-regulated, it falls under local shrub regulations requiring a filing. The approval process for a pumping test, involving drilling an eight-inch test well for a minimum five-day test, was outlined. The submission process allows for up to 66 days of review, with hopes for a quicker decision.

The board also reviewed station design updates, analyzing topography and potential road alignments for site access. Three options were presented, with Alignment C preferred due to less tree clearing despite some wetland buffer zone impact. The analysis memo considered buffer zone impacts, tree clearing, and costs, highlighting the trade-offs involved. The board expressed a preference for Alignment C, recognizing its advantages in minimizing environmental impact and reducing costs.

In addition, discussions touched on land acquisition for water supply purposes, with prior conversations with state officials suggesting minimal issues. Clarification was needed on whether a public hearing would be required. Updates on the State Revolving Fund (SRF) funding application were provided, noting progress in the construction funding application evaluation form. A motion was made to authorize the chair to act on behalf of the applicant for future grant or loan assistance applications.

The meeting also addressed ongoing construction issues on Main Street, where updates on issues were sent to the responsible contractor. Reports of valve boxes being paved over prompted revisions to the list of concerns. The contractor was tasked with exposing these boxes to ensure maintenance operations proceed without delays.