The council’s exploration of a mobile app to bolster communication emerged as a primary focus. Recognizing that many residents feel disconnected from local government activities, the council discussed the potential for a mobile app to serve as a centralized information hub. The proposed app would provide push notifications about important updates, meetings, and events. The app is envisioned to be informational rather than transactional, focusing initially on delivering timely news and updates rather than handling payments or permits. A prototype has been developed, and GOG gov, a vendor specializing in municipal applications, was identified as a potential partner. The app’s cost was estimated at $4,000 per year for three years, with features designed for ease of use and municipal alignment.

Concerns were raised about the app’s “cookie-cutter” nature, but its immediate benefits, such as ease of use and extensive support, were highlighted as significant advantages. The application would mirror the township’s website content, streamlining updates through an API connection. The conversation also touched on the importance of ensuring that the app is low maintenance due to limited personnel resources. The need for compliance with public records laws was addressed, as any content disseminated through the app would be subject to open public records requests. The council agreed to explore the app further, with a low-cost prototype being suggested to gauge community interest before committing to a long-term contract.

The meeting also saw discussion on accessibility improvements at a public field, addressing a complaint received over a year ago. The council considered a proposal to create accessible parking and pathways, which would require an expenditure of $75,000. The discussion acknowledged the need to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) while balancing budgetary constraints. The feasibility of adding more than one accessible parking spot was debated, with space constraints limiting the options. Concerns about maintenance costs of the proposed improvements were also raised. The council remained committed to addressing the accessibility complaint while considering financial implications.

Infrastructure issues took center stage as the council discussed erosion problems at a gravel driveway leading to an athletic field, exacerbated by stormwater runoff. The council explored paving the driveway and installing a rolled asphalt curb to manage runoff effectively, reducing maintenance needs. Attention was also given to the layout of parking stalls and ensuring proper design for vehicle maneuvering.

The council revisited the topic of a river road sewer service area amendment, considering whether to maintain the status quo or remove the area from the sewer service zone. Community feedback had been mixed, and the council debated the implications of potential dense development. Environmental considerations, such as wetlands and flood hazard restrictions, were highlighted as barriers to development. The council leaned towards maintaining the current status, given the lack of overwhelming demand for change.

Traffic safety at the intersection of Fairmont Avenue and River Road was another topic of concern. The council reviewed a traffic and site distance analysis, noting that while data suggested the need for improvements, current traffic patterns were skewed by temporary bridge construction and detours. The council acknowledged public sentiment regarding a temporary traffic light and explored options for configuration improvements, including a potential roundabout.

The meeting featured updates on ongoing infrastructure projects, including road improvements funded by a Department of Transportation grant, and a new generator for the Southside pump station to enhance emergency preparedness. Upcoming major upgrades to the sewage treatment facility were also discussed.