The meeting commenced with a lengthy discussion about parking challenges near Austin Prep. Residents voiced concerns over the increase in traffic and parking issues attributed to the school’s expansion, particularly pointing to safety risks for children and inadequate parking provisions. A resident recounted alarming experiences with reckless driving by students and criticized Austin Prep for not accommodating the increased student population, stating, “This has gotten incredibly terrible over the past few years because of the school basically admitting to taking on more students than they can handle.” Another resident supported the implementation of a parking permit system, linking it to enhanced safety and expressing doubts that planned parking expansions would sufficiently address the overflow.

The board debated the balance between accommodating residents’ needs and the potential complications of increased signage. The absence of Austin Prep representatives at the meeting was noted, with board members expressing frustration over the lack of engagement from the school’s leadership, particularly Dr. Hickey, who had not attended the meeting despite prior indications of willingness. This absence was described as a “disgrace” for a private institution of Austin Prep’s stature. The board emphasized the necessity of more proactive engagement from the school to address resident concerns and discussed strategies to enforce parking regulations, including potential ticketing and towing.

The meeting also turned to the proposed use of Matara Cabin by Malbury Forest School, a new nonprofit micro school seeking to utilize town conservation land for educational purposes. The chair of the conservation commission expressed strong support for the school, highlighting its alignment with the commission’s mission to foster environmental education. The proposal involves minimal indoor activity, mainly for shelter and bathroom access, while outdoor activities focus on environmental stewardship.

However, the proposal raised concerns about financial viability and operational logistics. The school representative explained their mission to provide nature-based education and plans for maintaining the property. The proposed licensing fee for using the cabin, estimated at $5,000 to $6,000 annually, was a point of contention. The town’s suggested fee was higher, around $9,300, prompting discussions on financial terms depending on enrollment and fundraising efforts.

Safety, liability, and logistical considerations were key discussion points, with the need for full liability insurance and proper evacuation plans emphasized. The board acknowledged the complexities of the arrangement, balancing enthusiasm for the educational initiative with concerns over fairness and precedent-setting for future nonprofit partnerships.

Additionally, the board addressed various budgetary concerns, including a special education contingency line item estimated at $700,000 for potential out-of-district placements, highlighting the financial strain on the town’s resources. The board expressed a desire for close monitoring and confirmation of these estimates from the school department.

The meeting concluded with discussions on funding allocations for town committees, with a focus on ensuring equitable distribution of limited resources. The board agreed to a funding plan that maintained support for various committees.