The meeting opened with a discussion on the potential installation of speed bumps on North Lyle Street. Residents had expressed concerns about speeding vehicles circumventing traffic lights, prompting the police chief to share collected data. A traffic data collection box revealed that while the 85th percentile of vehicles was traveling at 27 miles per hour—just above the 25 mph limit—concerns persisted due to the street’s narrowness, which can create an illusion of higher speeds. The police chief and traffic engineer agreed that current data did not support the installation of speed bumps, emphasizing the need for a policy outlining criteria for such measures. Alternative solutions like additional signage and turn restrictions during peak hours were suggested to manage traffic flow.

Another topic was the proposed ropes course at the Tenafly Nature Center, linked to resolution R25-391. The initiative attracted community attention and inquiries, especially following information on social media. It was clarified that the resolution is exploratory, seeking proposals from qualified firms to assess the feasibility of such a development. Council members stressed the importance of aligning the project with the council’s vision and ensuring it does not harm existing trees or wildlife. Concerns were raised about public understanding of the term “concession,” with assurances that it referred to the operation of the ropes course, not food or beverage services. The council emphasized transparency and public involvement in the project’s ongoing discussions.

Roadwork disruptions due to PSEG’s operations were also a focal point. The council addressed concerns about the prolonged impact on local streets and the need for timely restoration. PSEG had begun repaving in some areas, but council members sought improved communication regarding timelines and affected streets. A meeting with PSEG representatives was scheduled to address these issues. The council discussed PSEG’s accountability for repaving recently paved roads they impact, emphasizing the need for efficient work and communication.

Additional discussions included legislative matters, such as the introduction and approval of ordinances related to traffic concerns and outdoor dining mechanisms. Ordinance 25-22, involving the vacating of portions of Piermont Road, prompted discussions about traffic light timing improvements. Ordinance 25-20, amending sign regulations for A-frame signage, and ordinance 25-21, enhancing outdoor dining options, were both approved without public comments.

In the realm of community amenities, council members raised questions about the municipal pool, specifically regarding its changing facilities and cleanliness in lifeguard areas. Concerns about seating for elderly residents and children, as well as cleanliness issues, were acknowledged, with the administration committing to investigate solutions. Additionally, a fox population near a den raised safety concerns for pets, prompting discussions about appropriate measures.

The council also touched on ongoing projects, such as the River Edge median, which faced delays due to personnel absences but remained a priority. The introduction of resolution R25-367 for a grant application related to a tennis court project was discussed, with clarity provided on financial contributions from the county and borough.