One of the most debated topics was the placement of a new dog park adjacent to the playground at Lyman Park. Residents expressed apprehension about the safety implications of having the dog park so close to an area frequented by children. They highlighted that the dog park is only 11 feet from a playground sign that prohibits dogs, questioning the logic behind its location. Concerns were raised about the potential danger posed by dogs, especially aggressive ones, in proximity to children at play. A waiver required for dog park usage was cited as an acknowledgment by the town of possible risks. Residents urged the council to reconsider the decision, emphasizing child safety over pet owner interests.

In addition to safety concerns, residents expressed dissatisfaction with the process leading to the dog park’s establishment. Jeff Sbert criticized the town’s handling of the dog park, pointing out a lack of communication with local residents and inadequate space for children to play. He noted that the mulch delivered for the park obstructed recreational activities like basketball, and questioned the regulation of who uses the dog park, as dog sitters sometimes bring multiple dogs. Judy Simon, a mother of young children, voiced her frustration about the neglected playground maintenance and the impact of the dog park’s proximity on the safety and enjoyment of the area for children.

Traffic safety on West Franklin Avenue emerged as another major concern. Residents reported that vehicles parked on both sides of the street during church services created a narrow and hazardous passage, particularly endangering children on bikes. Suggestions were made to limit parking to one side of the street to alleviate congestion and improve safety. The council acknowledged the issue, with Mr. Brewer noting that previous evaluations had been conducted and recommendations made to potentially limit parking. However, no legislative action had been taken, leading to a suggestion to reassess the situation based on renewed public concern.

The council also discussed the need for a safety study of the boulevard, with Mr. Brewer supporting Morris County’s application to the New Jersey Transportation Authority. The study aims to address longstanding safety issues, including incidents of vehicles failing to stop and ending up on residents’ lawns. The council characterized the study as beneficial, with the potential for significant public outreach and participation.

During the meeting, public comments highlighted a divide between residents advocating for child safety and those supporting recreational facilities for pets. This debate underscored the challenges in community planning and resource allocation faced by the township. In response to the concerns, the council agreed to revisit both the dog park placement and West Franklin Avenue’s parking situation.

Council discussions also touched on routine matters, such as renewing alcoholic beverage control licenses and appointing members to advisory committees. However, procedural issues arose regarding the lack of names in the documentation for resolution R 2025133. The council decided to postpone the resolution until the following month, agreeing on May 29 as the cutoff date for application submissions.

Additionally, resolution R 2025135 concerning sewer use payment delinquency prompted inquiries about contract statuses. A council member expressed frustration over difficulties in contacting relevant parties and emphasized the urgency of addressing the situation, highlighting challenges in communication despite repeated attempts.