The meeting began with representatives from Germunk Oil LLC presenting their application, which included a revised site plan aimed at minimal expansion. Mr. Tyler Vanderval, the project engineer, addressed previous inquiries regarding vehicle maneuverability and site drainage. Vanderval also assured that the drainage system would connect to an existing catch basin on Third Street. Concerns about signage were alleviated by confirming that the new signs were smaller than those previously approved.

Landscaping issues were a focal point, with Mr. Ben Heler, a landscape architect, detailing plans to replace dead or missing vegetation. This included 12 evergreens and five shade trees, alongside 38 new shrubs, to enhance the site’s aesthetic and provide a buffer to neighboring properties. During the discussion, a participant emphasized the importance of preserving healthy trees on the site, a sentiment echoed by others who voiced concerns over potential tree removal. Heler clarified that healthy mature trees would remain, and the property would maintain its vegetative buffer.

Traffic and safety concerns were paramount, particularly regarding the site’s ability to accommodate large vehicles like tractor trailers. A participant argued for a comprehensive traffic study, citing past accidents involving large trucks in the area. The board discussed the appropriateness of the site for such vehicles and considered restrictions on certain large trucks to mitigate safety risks. Furthermore, the meeting highlighted issues with property maintenance, as residents reported garbage accumulation and deteriorating conditions, emphasizing the need for improved site management.

The architectural elements of the proposed convenience store were also scrutinized, with the design featuring a rectangular structure with a stone veneer exterior and a standing seam metal roof. The applicant confirmed that the building’s design would not include exterior lighting on the back to respect neighboring properties. Operational aspects were detailed, with the store expected to function with two employees and adhere to specified hours of operation, avoiding peak traffic times for fuel deliveries.

Community members expressed skepticism about the project’s scale relative to the site’s size. Concerns over traffic congestion, pedestrian safety, and the impact on neighborhood quality were reiterated, with residents calling for accountability in property maintenance and safety improvements. The board acknowledged these concerns, emphasizing the need for ongoing community feedback and vigilance regarding the site’s upkeep.

In addition to the gas station discussion, the meeting addressed a proposal from Cafe Amelia for a site plan modification, involving a new two-story addition to their existing restaurant. This proposal included a D1 use variance for the restaurant and bar, not typically permitted in the R20 zone, and a D4 floor area ratio variance. The applicant’s representative outlined plans for the restaurant’s expansion, which would feature a banquet hall, courtyard, and rooftop bar, with a focus on maintaining compliance with zoning requirements and mitigating any negative impact on the public good.

The board deliberated on various aspects of the Cafe Amelia proposal, including the increase in employee numbers, impervious coverage, and the historical compliance of the property. The applicant’s representative admitted to a lack of historical knowledge about the property’s use and zoning approvals, prompting calls for transparency and detailed records to inform decision-making. Parking arrangements and seating capacity were also discussed, with proposed valet services and design waivers needed to accommodate the site’s constraints.