Central to the board’s discussions was the subdivision and site plan approval for the development, which will feature three buildings with a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom units. The site plan includes provisions for 89 parking spaces, exceeding the minimum requirement, and incorporates electric vehicle charging stations. The project is designed to meet all bulk requirements of the Catch Road redevelopment plan, with an emphasis on maintaining affordability by securing low-income housing tax credits. The board unanimously approved the application, subject to several conditions including compliance with fire safety regulations and utility requirements.

Public sentiment was divided, with several residents voicing strong objections to the project. Concerns were raised about increased traffic congestion, particularly during peak hours, and the potential safety risks posed by the shared access road with a nearby park. Residents highlighted the high traffic volumes during Sunday soccer games and the potential dangers for children and families using the road. Questions were also raised regarding the adequacy of emergency access, with assurances provided that the project design meets all necessary safety standards.

Environmental considerations were another focal point of the public’s concerns. Residents inquired about the potential displacement of local wildlife and the impact on wetlands, with the board confirming that the project complies with state environmental regulations. The site plan includes stormwater management features designed to reduce runoff and improve water quality, such as bio-retention basins and permeable pavement.

The architectural design of the buildings was scrutinized, particularly the rear facades facing Catch Road. Board members and residents expressed concerns about the aesthetic quality and compliance with local design standards, leading to a commitment from the applicant to prepare a detailed design report addressing these issues. The applicant also pledged to consult with the housing authority regarding pedestrian access and emergency services, and to landscape the proposed “hot box” for water control to minimize visual impact.

The meeting featured robust public commentary, with many residents questioning the board’s decision-making process and the perceived urgency of approving the development. Some voiced frustration over the lack of clarity and transparency in previous meetings, while others highlighted the need for more comprehensive planning to address traffic and safety concerns adequately. Despite the opposition, the board emphasized the importance of fulfilling the township’s affordable housing obligations, noting the legal and financial benefits of developing 100% affordable housing on the designated site.