The lifeguard headquarters renovation proposal was presented by Paul Dietrich, the city engineer and city manager, and was a focal point of the meeting due to its implications for the community and historical landscape. Despite being outside the designated historic district, the building’s placement in a national historic landmark area necessitated the commission’s input. Dietrich outlined the project, emphasizing that it would not expand the building’s footprint, acknowledging community concerns about previous expansion attempts. The renovations aim to improve gender equity by enhancing facilities for female lifeguards, which now constitute nearly half of the workforce.

Dietrich plans to relocate a handicap ramp from the east to the west side of the building. The renovation proposal includes upgrades to both the men’s and women’s locker rooms, incorporating additional showers and restroom facilities to better support lifeguard operations. The commission members engaged in a thorough discussion, with some commending the minimal impact of the proposed changes on the streetscape. The project was described as a “stealth expansion,” reflecting its subtlety and consideration for the area’s visual character.

Beyond the lifeguard headquarters, the commission also reviewed various applications concerning other historic properties. A notable discussion involved a project on Corgi Terrace, where property owners returned to the commission with revised plans. The commission appreciated the clarity of the submission, although questions about specific architectural details, such as the triangular pediment, required additional documentation to ensure compliance during field inspections.

Another deliberation focused on Mortimer’s property on West Perry Street, where the removal of a decayed staircase led to the proposal of a new front landing and stairs. The commission discussed the streetscape impact, ultimately supporting the addition for its visual enhancement and alignment with neighborhood aesthetics. However, concerns arose regarding the phrasing of plans referring to a garage area, prompting clarifications to ensure the space was intended solely as an entryway, given the absence of a driveway.

Further debate ensued over a project involving an unauthorized deck extension at a historic building. The commission expressed concerns about the deck’s size and placement on the front of a contributing structure, emphasizing the need to restore the house to its original appearance. Suggestions were made to replicate the previous stairway’s dimensions to preserve the home’s historical integrity while allowing for functional improvements.

In another application review, the commission considered a proposal by Cement Ship Incorporated on Beach Avenue, which had undergone multiple revisions to address visibility issues. The project involved a rear east-side addition designed to be removable and minimize its impact on the main structure. Landscaping was introduced to soften the visibility, aligning with standards for side additions. The commission acknowledged the applicant’s efforts to maintain the building’s architectural identity while allowing necessary updates.

Lastly, a project by DAS Architects was discussed, highlighting the need for comprehensive materials to support final approval. Despite prior discussions and revisions, the commission emphasized the importance of detailed documentation, including floor plans and cut sheets for materials, to ensure compliance with preservation standards. The project’s impact on the streetscape and its architectural cohesiveness with the existing structure were key considerations.