At the heart of the discussions was the request by the applicant for several variances, notably a D4 variance for exceeding the maximum floor area ratio (FAR), with plans to expand the FAR from the allowed 0.6 to 0.736. This increase would result in a total floor area of 7,213 square feet, a 187% increase from current allowances. This variance, among others related to setbacks and height, was a point of contention, as the board evaluated the site’s capacity to accommodate these changes without negative impacts on the neighborhood.

Accessibility was a critical concern raised during the meeting, with multiple board members questioning the layout of the ADA-compliant parking and access paths. Questions focused on whether the proposed ADA parking space location would create safety risks for wheelchair users, requiring them to navigate behind parked vehicles. Suggestions were made to relocate the ADA space to provide a clearer sightline and safer access for individuals with disabilities. In response, it was noted that ADA spots were available nearby on Witherspoon Street, supplemented by a new crosswalk to aid accessibility.

The proposal also included plans for a basement laundromat, seen as a vital community service. However, the fire official expressed concerns about the potential hazards, strongly recommending a fire suppression system due to the inherent risks associated with laundromats. The applicant agreed to install a sprinkler system, though this had not been initially documented.

Further complicating the application was the preservation of the site’s historical elements. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) was heavily involved, commending the applicant for maintaining the existing building’s historical fabric and proposing a glazed hyphen to separate the new addition. Concerns about the massing and bulk of the addition were highlighted, particularly its visual impact on the Witherspoon Jackson Historic District. The HPC recommended several design modifications, including adjusting the roofline and massing to better integrate with the historic neighborhood character.

The meeting also touched on landscaping, with recommendations to incorporate native and shade-tolerant plants to soften the building’s impact. The applicant’s landscape architect suggested removing invasive species and enhancing the site’s greenery, aligning with sustainability goals that include a green roof, solar panels, and geothermal energy.

Parking emerged as a concern, with the proposed site plan offering six parking stalls, well below the 53 required for business zoning. The applicant requested a variance for this shortfall, arguing that nearby parking options, such as the available capacity at the Avalon garage, would cater to demand. Traffic consultant estimates suggested an increase in vehicular trips, albeit manageable. The proximity of transit options and the potential for increased pedestrian and cyclist traffic were noted as mitigating factors.

Board members expressed a desire to hear further from municipal staff and other commissions, such as the environmental commission, before concluding. The application was carried over to a subsequent meeting date, with the board emphasizing the need for comprehensive review and input from all relevant parties. The session adjourned with an agreement to reconvene with a focus on resolving outstanding issues and ensuring a examination of the proposal’s implications.