The housing production plan presentation by a representative from the Northern Middlesex Council of Governments (NIMCOG) was a focal point. The plan, developed with input from community events and surveys, identified eight key housing issues, including the need for more affordable housing units, especially for seniors and non-family households. The plan set forth five primary goals, such as expanding affordable housing units, preserving existing housing stock, and supporting sustainable development patterns. Four major strategies were proposed to achieve these goals, involving partnerships with developers, improving land use regulations, enhancing outreach about affordable housing options, and identifying new funding sources.

A notable aspect of the discussion was the concern over maintaining Chelmsford’s Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) above 10% to secure safe harbor status under Chapter 40B regulations. Board members highlighted the disparity between housing prices and median income levels, with many residents spending more than 30% of their income on housing. The discussion suggested that increasing the supply of smaller, affordable homes could alleviate cost burdens. The board also examined the potential to enhance inclusionary zoning bylaws and increase awareness of affordable housing options among residents.

The proposed contractor’s yard development at 1911-195 Riverneck Road was another major topic. The proposal by Commonwealth Construction Utilities Incorporated involves constructing two buildings, including a 14-bay contractor’s building, on a 5-acre site. The development is situated within an aquifer protection district, raising concerns about environmental impacts and compliance with Massachusetts stormwater regulations. The project’s stormwater management plan includes a system designed to achieve 97% Total Suspended Solids removal, with additional measures to prevent leaks and spills from contaminating the aquifer.

Public comments reflected significant opposition to the contractor yard proposal, citing potential threats to the town’s drinking water supply and neighborhood compatibility. Residents expressed concerns about increased noise, dust, and traffic, emphasizing the development’s incompatibility with the residential character of Riverneck Road. The presence of multiple tenants at the site raised questions about operational hours, noise levels, and light pollution. One resident described the existing natural wooded lot as a sound barrier that would be lost with the development, increasing noise levels for the community.

Environmental concerns were a recurring theme, with discussions on potential contamination from chemicals and vehicle leaks. The development’s impact on wildlife habitat and tree canopy loss was also highlighted. Residents urged the board to consider compensatory measures, such as planting trees elsewhere to offset the loss.

Traffic concerns were another significant issue, with residents questioning the accuracy of traffic projections and the potential disturbance from truck activity. The proposal’s proximity to residential homes and narrow roads raised safety concerns, particularly for children waiting at bus stops. A peer traffic review was suggested to address these issues comprehensively.

The meeting also touched on broader zoning changes, such as the proposed transition from IIA to CB Light zoning for properties like Lockheed’s. The goal is to reduce zoning conflicts and enhance neighborhood quality by consolidating the best uses from existing zones. Public comments on this topic included concerns about potential light pollution, noise, and large truck access. The board emphasized the importance of engaging with the community and considering the implications of zoning changes on existing properties and easements.