The most debated topic centered on the proposed rise in impact fees, which are charges levied on new developments to fund municipal services like police, fire, and parks. The council was presented with results from a study conducted by Raft Tillis, recommending substantial increases in these fees to support the city’s infrastructure needs. The proposed fees for residential units are set to rise significantly, prompting concerns as these increases exceed statutory caps and require phased implementation over several years. The urgency of the matter is compounded by upcoming legislative changes that complicate the process of applying these increases under extraordinary circumstances. Council members expressed caution, acknowledging potential legal challenges from developers who might view the increases as burdensome.

In light of these potential challenges, the council discussed the need to balance the immediate financial requirements for public safety and recreation against the risks of litigation. The impact fees were last updated in 2016, and with the city’s growth outpacing state averages, there is a pressing need to address funding for capital improvements. The council debated the merits of waiting for further legislative clarity or proceeding with the proposed increases to meet the city’s needs.

Golden Gem Road was another focal point of the meeting, with discussions about its potential transfer from county to city jurisdiction. The road, which is heavily trafficked and lacks necessary improvements, poses safety and connectivity challenges for residents. A resident voiced frustration over the collection of impact fees from developments in the area without corresponding enhancements to the road infrastructure. The council acknowledged the complexities of negotiating with Orange County and the financial burden of taking over the road’s maintenance without sufficient funding.

The council also examined other infrastructure projects, including a proposed mountain bike park that would involve a land swap with the Ridge self-storage property. The Southern Off-Road Bicycle Association proposed a park design that could attract visitors and generate economic benefits for the city. However, council members debated the project’s scale and cost, with some advocating for smaller, distributed parks to better engage the community.

Further, the council addressed the city’s road maintenance strategy for FY26, with plans to resurface several miles of roads using allocated funds. The streets and storm water administrator provided a detailed update on the methodologies and costs involved, emphasizing the need for strategic planning in road improvements.

In addition to infrastructure discussions, the council tackled the contentious topic of commissioner compensation. A study revealed discrepancies in salaries compared to surrounding cities, prompting calls for a formal workshop to establish clear policies. The need for transparency and community involvement in determining compensation was emphasized, with a workshop proposed for October 15.

A resolution to streamline meeting minutes sparked debate, with concerns about accuracy and transparency in documenting council proceedings.