A critical part of the meeting focused on proposed amendments to boat storage regulations in residential areas. The board debated whether to allow multiple boats on a single property and where they should be stored. Concerns were raised about the potential for neighborhoods, particularly those with smaller lots like Captain’s Village, to become cluttered with boats obstructing views and access. The current bylaw requires boats to be stored behind the front line of the house, but this creates challenges for residents with limited space.

Proposals included limiting boat storage to one per lot, either in the backyard or driveway, to preserve the residential character of neighborhoods. However, some members argued for more flexibility, suggesting that if boats were allowed in driveways, the restrictions should be lifted altogether. The issue of enforcement was a concern, with potential changes potentially leading to increased complaints.

The board proposed presenting the current discussions to the select board, emphasizing the importance of gathering feedback on the proposed amendments.

In another significant agenda item, the board considered the town’s participation in the Complete Streets program, introduced by Town Engineer Amanda Lima. This Mass DOT-sponsored initiative aims to enhance transportation networks by providing safe and accessible travel options for all modes. The board received a preliminary draft policy requiring adoption by the select board to access $500,000 in funding over four years. Although adoption is not mandatory, it is necessary for towns seeking funding opportunities.

The board expressed curiosity about the public outreach component of the program, with Lima noting previous efforts by the Cape Cod Commission. She mentioned that her team would conduct events along the rail trail to gather community input. Concerns were raised regarding the compatibility of the policy with the local comprehensive plan, but Lima assured that it would complement existing transportation strategies.

The discussion revealed a cautious approach to utilizing state funds, with board members emphasizing the need to ensure that proposals align with local interests. The conversation also touched on the feasibility of applying for grants under both the Complete Streets and Safe Routes to School programs.

The meeting also delved into the Local Comprehensive Plan, a substantial 155-page document. Efforts to publicize the plan included outreach to neighborhood associations, community organizations, and a planned radio spot. The board outlined a timeline for further discussions and public hearings. The board planned to present the draft to the select board on August 12, emphasizing its legislative importance and role in securing grants.

Discussion arose about the organization of the LCP, with members suggesting restructuring to enhance readability and accessibility. The sentiment was that targeted action items should be placed immediately following each topic rather than in a separate chapter. This approach would allow for a more cohesive understanding of the issues and related actions.

Lastly, the meeting addressed delays in the town’s sewer project, particularly impacting the Madak site due to a lack of sewer connection. This delay could diminish development potential at the site. The board discussed the scope of contract number six, which is on hold because of pump station issues. Public outreach was emphasized regarding the project’s progress, as the community will need to approve additional funding in 2026 for necessary work not included in previous financial projections.

The board also touched on the broader context of upcoming projects and fiscal responsibilities, including a library project, a potential school project, and a fire station. These projects, separate from the previously discussed $27 million project, raise concerns about funding and public willingness to commit additional resources.