A major topic of the meeting was the application for a duplex on Elm Street presented by Daniel Campbell from Level Design Group. The proposal involved building a duplex on a lot that is currently a parking lot. The lot size, approximately 40,511 square feet, is undersized for a duplex, which requires 80,000 square feet in an R60 zone. Campbell argued that the existing multifamily properties in the area supported the development’s consistency with the neighborhood. The board deliberated whether they had the authority to grant the requested variance, as the zoning bylaws specify both a minimum lot area and a frontage requirement for duplexes. Nick Ferguson raised questions about the board’s historical decisions on similar cases, noting past variances granted for properties with less than the required square footage. The board ultimately decided to continue discussions on the duplex application until its September meeting, requesting revised plans that address compliance with water resource protection requirements.

Environmental concerns were a part of the meeting, particularly regarding the property on Elm LLC. Public comments highlighted the land’s history, including its sale for $1,500 due to back taxes and potential contamination from a neighboring site. Mr. Bob Kimble raised alarms about the contamination, pointing out that the land had not yet been purchased. He referenced past findings of contamination plumes in the area, emphasizing the need for environmental assessments before any construction. Campbell confirmed the presence of monitoring wells and ongoing contamination cleanup efforts, reiterating that reports are submitted to the board of health. Discussions also addressed the proposed duplex’s elevation, designed to be above groundwater levels to mitigate potential contamination risks. The board recognized the importance of these environmental issues, although they typically fall outside its purview.

The meeting also addressed procedural matters, including setback requirements and the status of the land on Elm LLC. Board members noted the lack of specific setback dimensions on the submitted plans, a standard prerequisite for their review. Despite this, there was consensus that the application met all setback requirements, contrasting with typical cases where lot coverage impedes setbacks. The board discussed encouraging housing developments, including duplexes, which they viewed positively for the town. However, further deliberations on the application were postponed to allow for a new plan submission.

Another application considered during the meeting involved a proposal by Amy Williams and Brian Chase for side yard and front yard setback reductions on Island Road. The couple sought to add a detached garage and convert the existing garage into living space. Concerns arose regarding the zoning implications of the proposed changes, particularly the visibility from the street and potential impacts on surrounding properties. The board discussed whether the changes would trigger regulations concerning increases in living space, with Chase assuring that the changes aimed to enhance functionality without altering the property’s overall footprint.