One notable issue involved the proposed development’s impact on traffic and local infrastructure. The site, located south of Royal Highlands Boulevard, is currently zoned for mixed-use development under Lake County’s zoning regulations, which allow for a significant commercial footprint. The plan presented to the board sought to rezone the property for residential use, citing a decrease in traffic impact compared to a commercial development. Residents and board members alike expressed concerns about the adequacy of existing roads, particularly given the area’s history of congestion and accidents. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) would oversee any required infrastructure upgrades, with the developer noting that a traffic study had been conducted to support the proposal.

The development’s classification as low-density was questioned, with clarification provided that it adheres to Leesburg’s zoning definition of low-density as eight units per acre or less. Residents voiced concerns that the new development might alter the community’s demographic structure due to a lack of age restrictions, which are determined by market forces rather than municipal mandates.

Water and utility infrastructure was another focal point, with residents sharing experiences of inadequate water pressure and quality. The board discussed whether the city would need to upgrade these systems should the development proceed. The proposal includes a retention pond, which sparked debate over maintenance responsibilities and whether the HOA or the developers would take charge. The developers assured the pond was designed to manage stormwater runoff effectively, aligned with regulatory standards, and that ongoing discussions with the St. John’s Water Management District would address any additional requirements.

The board’s deliberations also highlighted community concerns about the aesthetic and functional integration of the new townhomes with existing neighborhoods. Residents worried about potential noise, traffic changes, and the impact of rental properties on community cohesion. The developers committed to prohibiting short-term rentals.

The board faced a divided opinion on the approval of the development, with motions to approve or reject the comprehensive plan amendment and zoning change both resulting in tied votes. These decisions will be forwarded to the city commission, with the board chair noting the importance of participation in upcoming discussions scheduled for September and October.

In addition to the Royal Highlands case, the board reviewed a separate rezoning request for a property on East Main, seeking to rectify a zoning inconsistency by changing the designation from residential to commercial. This request was met with unanimous approval, underscoring its alignment with the surrounding commercial landscape and resolving a case of spot zoning.