The most notable issue at the meeting revolved around the conditional use request for a restaurant and bar on Centon Drive, presented by Coastal Interstates Holding LLC. The proposal faced opposition from adjacent property owners who, through their legal representative, requested a 60-day continuance to prepare expert testimony, arguing that the notice period of 15 days by mail and 10 days in the newspaper was insufficient. The attorney for the intervening parties emphasized the need to compile “competent substantial evidence,” including traffic and planning studies, to ensure a fair hearing. The board was urged to allow the public present to express their opinions, while also considering the procedural rights of the intervenors.

Despite these concerns, the board eventually decided to proceed with the hearing while acknowledging the intervenors’ standing. The board was informed by staff that the proposed restaurant and bar could operate in a manner consistent with the surrounding properties, noting its historical usage as a marina and restaurant. The planning director underscored the importance of procedural fairness while noting the need for a prompt decision.

Further complicating the issue was the proposal by Southwind Marina to expand its operations to include food and beverage services with outdoor entertainment. The applicant highlighted plans to manage noise by adhering to local ordinances and limiting special events. However, staff pointed out that outdoor entertainment was not permissible under the current zoning designation, leading to a heated discussion about zoning compliance. The applicant’s representative argued that the proposed enhancements were compatible with existing marina operations in Florida, yet acknowledged a lack of independent studies on traffic and environmental impacts, raising questions about their preparedness.

Public input played a role in shaping the discussion. Various speakers expressed mixed opinions about the marina’s proposed enhancements. Dave Glassman, a local veteran and community leader, underscored the marina’s importance as a social venue for veterans and first responders. He emphasized the positive community impact, particularly for individuals facing personal challenges. In contrast, Christine Sensnik supported a brick-and-mortar restaurant with indoor music but opposed the inclusion of food trucks, citing concerns over noise and residential compatibility.

Norman McAllister, a nearby condominium resident, provided testimony against the proposal, highlighting concerns over noise, traffic, and the potential return of disruptive elements reminiscent of past business operations. He emphasized the predominantly residential character of the area and the lack of adequate notice given to residents regarding the hearing.

The board discussed potential conditions to mitigate noise and traffic concerns, such as limiting the hours of operation and ensuring proper screening and buffering between commercial and residential areas. The applicant clarified intentions to operate within reasonable hours and comply with local regulations, but questions remained about the future implications of the proposal, especially regarding outdoor entertainment.

Ultimately, the board moved to accept the staff’s findings, which recommended approval of the restaurant and bar with conditions, including the completion of the Development Review Committee process and adherence to mobile vending unit regulations. However, outdoor entertainment was excluded from the approval.