A representative from Nelson Nygaard presented findings from a community transit study. The current system operates with a single vehicle on an 80-minute frequency, which many residents find inadequate. The council discussed short-term solutions, including the addition of a second bus to improve service frequency, with an estimated annual cost of $395,000. However, this proposal was contingent on the delivery of two electric shuttles expected in 2026.

The council also considered a microtransit program as an alternative or complementary solution. This on-demand service could offer greater flexibility, allowing residents to request rides as needed rather than adhering to fixed routes. The potential for integrating microtransit was supported by conversations with representatives from VIA, who suggested it could be more cost-effective than expanding the current fixed-route system. Funding for these transit enhancements would primarily come from increased parking revenues, which have not been raised in six years, as well as contributions from the university and affordable housing development partners.

Despite the enthusiasm for improving transit services, concerns were raised about the sufficiency of projected funding. The anticipated funds from developers, the university, and grants were estimated to be just under $2.4 million, leading to questions about whether this would adequately support the proposed transit program. The council highlighted the need for further financial scrutiny and emphasized the importance of ensuring that the new services would be accessible and beneficial to the broader community, not just new residents or those in specific areas like the shopping center.

In addition to transit discussions, the council agreed to engage a consultant to evaluate and potentially enhance existing services. The consultant’s role would be crucial in refining transit strategies and expansion plans, with a proposal from Telos Advisors under consideration due to its competitive fee structure. Some members proposed that both the consultant’s work and the transit service development occur concurrently, allowing for a comprehensive approach that includes community feedback and data-driven decision-making.

The meeting also touched on the necessity of bus shelters, particularly at stops that currently lack adequate facilities. The council acknowledged that funding might be available to address this issue, although no definitive plans were established during the session.

Two ordinances were introduced during the meeting. The first involved leasing part of the community park south tennis facility for public use, while the second proposed an amendment to the land use chapter to create an affordable housing district. Both ordinances were passed unanimously.

Other resolutions included appointing a new deputy municipal clerk and authorizing contracts for sewer rehabilitation and a zoning code update. The zoning code update, in particular, was highlighted as a multi-year effort requiring careful planning and execution.

Public comments featured representatives from the Princeton triathlon, who shared positive feedback about the recent event. They praised the inclusive nature of the triathlon, which saw participation from individuals aged seven to seventy-seven, and expressed gratitude for the council’s support.