The intersection of Chatham Road and Woodland Road was a major focal point for community members who expressed alarm over pedestrian safety due to ongoing construction and traffic congestion. One resident highlighted the dangers, recalling a tragic incident where a pedestrian was struck and killed by a vehicle. This intersection’s proximity to the train station exacerbates the risk as drivers frequently rush to catch trains, creating a hazardous environment for pedestrians. The speaker described the precariousness pedestrians face, likening it to a “game of frog,” underscoring the need for immediate safety measures.

Concerns were also raised about the practice of employing young children to signal traffic with flags, a method deemed unsafe by several residents. The ensuing debate centered on whether such practices genuinely enhance safety or merely introduce additional risks. The lack of a crossing guard at this intersection was also criticized, with suggestions for a guard to ensure student safety as they cross to Glenwood School.

The meeting also addressed liquor license allocations, a contentious issue given its implications for local business growth. The council acknowledged that changes at the state level might be necessary to facilitate a more effective allocation of these licenses.

The issue of business development in downtown Millburn was a recurring theme, with residents expressing dissatisfaction over high vacancy rates and insufficient business attraction efforts. One participant pointedly remarked that the Special Improvement District, Explore, was not fulfilling its role in revitalizing the downtown area.

Discussions on pedestrian safety extended to other areas, including Essex Street and Claremont Avenue, where new traffic lights and stop signs were proposed to manage the speed of vehicles. Concerns about speeding and pedestrian safety were echoed by residents who advocated for additional measures, such as converting Chadam into a three-way stop to improve safety for children walking to nearby schools.

The council also explored the implications of residency requirements for advisory board members. Discrepancies in board membership criteria were noted, with some boards requiring members to be residents, while others did not. The call for uniformity in residency requirements was made. This sparked a discussion about the value of contributions from long-term residents who have since moved away, and whether they should continue to serve on boards.

Moreover, the council discussed significant amendments to zoning regulations, introducing ordinances to update lighting standards and landscaping requirements, as well as clarifying accessory use provisions in residential districts. These changes aim to provide clearer guidelines for development and ensure that infrastructure improvements align with community standards.

Public safety around construction sites was another topic of concern, particularly with temporary sidewalks and the potential hazards they create for pedestrians. The council acknowledged the need for better oversight and protection measures to ensure pedestrian safety amidst ongoing development projects.