The primary focus of the meeting was the establishment of a task force to oversee the town’s managed growth strategy. The board approved 12 candidates for this task force, which includes representatives from the planning board, select board, and conservation commission, as well as various committees and citizen representatives. The task force will be co-chaired by two board members. The draft charge statement for the task force outlined roles, responsibilities, timelines, and milestones, with emphasis on utilizing existing data rather than duplicating efforts in gathering community feedback.

The board then delved into the housing production plan (HPP), discussing its integration with the strategic growth plan. Despite Chelmsford exceeding the state threshold for affordable housing, the need for an HPP was justified by local control, proactive planning, and preparation for demographic changes. Concerns lingered over accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and ‘missing middle housing’ strategies. Additionally, the board noted the absence of state funding for converting vacant office buildings to residential use outside Boston and stressed the importance of monitoring deed restrictions related to the Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) to avoid potential issues.

Traffic concerns dominated discussions about the implications of new developments, particularly on Riverneck Road, where projected increases in vehicle flow raised alarms. The road’s capacity was scrutinized, with estimates indicating a worsening level of service from D to F during peak hours with the proposed projects. The board acknowledged the need for a peer review of the traffic study to ensure confidence in the data presented, as the anticipated increase in truck traffic posed risks to roadway safety and residential quality of life. Historical context revealed that Riverneck Road’s original design was not meant to accommodate the current and projected traffic volume.

The meeting also addressed ongoing projects, including the Jackson Road subdivision’s bond reduction request to resolve drainage issues. Despite pressing timelines for paving, the board expressed skepticism about proceeding without confirming all conditions would be satisfactorily met. Residents voiced frustration over project delays and emphasized the need for competent contractors. The board sought assurances that the contractor would meet all requirements before releasing funds, highlighting the balance between urgency and due diligence to protect the town’s interests.

A proposal for a new building project on Princeton Street sparked debate over modifications made post-approval, with board members expressing dissatisfaction with the planning process. Modifications included removing a basement and adding a rooftop event space, necessitating a review of compliance with zoning and alcohol licensing requirements. Concerns over the building’s aesthetic changes and their impact on the neighborhood were raised, prompting the board to seek further clarity before granting approval.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on a rehabilitation center project on Bill Ricca Road. The board reviewed progress on plan modifications, including tree replacement and parking capacity improvements. Collaborative efforts with neighboring facilities and responsiveness to conservation concerns were highlighted as positive aspects of the development review process. The board emphasized the importance of comprehensive snow storage plans and landscape maintenance as conditions for approval.