The discussion surrounding the license agreement was thorough, with board members seeking assurances concerning the agreement’s scope and its implications for town access to its own rear property. The agreement stipulates that maintenance responsibilities fall to the developer, a point emphasized during discussions. A representative from Northtown Properties LLC expressed a preference for a permanent easement over the time-limited license, citing concerns over Article 97 related to parkland use, which could complicate future access changes. This sentiment was echoed by board members, who suggested collaboration with town departments to potentially improve access and explore the possibility of establishing a public way into Fernandes Park.

In addition to the license agreement, the board engaged in discussions regarding the use of town buildings, highlighting the need for a comprehensive policy to manage public access. The senior community center was a focal point, with board members working to balance community access with town operational needs. A newcomer to Norton, identified as Drew, voiced the need for meeting space for his condo association. Board members expressed a strong commitment to fulfilling previous promises made to the public about the accessibility of taxpayer-funded spaces.

A broader policy on the use of town buildings is still under consideration, with members emphasizing the importance of maintaining community access while ensuring that town operations are not hindered. Discussions revolved around implementing a structured policy for room usage, including mechanisms to revoke access if organizations fail to comply with established rules. The board recognized the need for a well-planned framework to accommodate both community and municipal needs.

In policy matters, the board adopted the Community Choice Coalition (CCC) host community municipal equity policy, favoring it over a more complex alternative proposed by KP Law. The CCC policy is expected to offer predictability and fairness for applicants, especially those from equity backgrounds. Additionally, the board updated its remote participation policy to align with state guidelines, promoting in-person attendance while accommodating remote participation to maximize public engagement.

The meeting also covered the sensitive issue of flag and sign postings on the town common. A new policy, primarily aimed at regulating controversial displays, was adopted with a focus on preserving the historic character of the common. A member abstained from the vote, expressing reservation about the policy’s implications, yet it passed with majority approval.

The board then reviewed the fall annual town meeting warrant articles, with the town manager providing an overview. Many articles remain placeholders pending updates from various departments. Concerns were raised about voting on articles without clear context, leading to agreement that further clarity would be required before making decisions. The town manager committed to delivering more detailed information at future meetings.

Discussions also touched on infrastructure projects, notably a $3.5 million water infrastructure upgrade. The project, funded by the Mass Works grant, aims to replace aging water mains, with board members expressing urgency in addressing the town’s water quality issues.