The most notable topic of the meeting was the discussion regarding the variance request for the Belfates subdivision project. Chris Vandenber, representing civil environmental consultants, presented the board with plans for two infiltration basins that adhere to a maximum height of three feet, which is within the regulatory limit. However, some members of the board expressed concerns about the safety of these basins, especially their accessibility to children and animals. This led to a robust conversation about the potential need for fences around the basins, despite the fact that the basins met all required specifications. Ultimately, the board voted in favor of the variance, with the stipulation that the installation of fencing be recommended to enhance safety.

Another concern discussed during the meeting was the state of water accessibility in Dighton. It was noted that the local water department has ceased issuing water permits, compelling new construction projects to rely on wells. This issue was highlighted in the context of Bell Farms, which is currently seeking approval to source water from Somerset, a decision that is still pending. The board acknowledged this development as part of their broader discussion on the variance request but determined that it did not present a barrier to approval.

The meeting also addressed a series of ongoing complaints related to a conservation review on Beach Street. An issue arose regarding the collection and credibility of a water sample, purportedly taken by a complainant named Ellen. One board member questioned the validity of this sample. Previous water samples from the area had shown acceptable levels, with some bacteria detected, but treatment was recommended rather than mandatory.

Additionally, the board tackled the task of revising local regulations. They discussed the need for straightforward regulations concerning dumpsters and portable bathroom facilities. There was consensus that existing documents were overly detailed, prompting a motion to draft simplified regulatory frameworks for both topics. These drafts are set to be reviewed at the next meeting.

The board also reviewed the town’s fee schedule, comparing it to those of surrounding municipalities. It was observed that while Dighton’s fees are generally aligned with neighboring areas, some fees are not currently being charged. The board agreed to conduct a detailed review to propose any necessary adjustments to the town administrator.

In administrative matters, the board addressed the open position for a board of health member, noting that no applications had been received. To remedy this, they suggested broader advertising, including potential social media outreach. The meeting concluded with a unanimous vote to approve the minutes from the previous meeting and the scheduling of their next meeting for October 21, 2025.