The focal point of the meeting was the community pool’s inaugural season, which received positive feedback from residents. The atmosphere and staff, particularly a staff member named Garrett, were commended for their engagement with the community. Financially, the pool ended the season with a balance of $358,128.03 available for capital expenditures, with discussions on how best to utilize these funds for future improvements.

One significant topic was the membership fee structure. The current fees were deemed substantial, with a $150 registration fee for residents and a $300 fee for non-residents, plus an additional membership fee. Despite concerns over affordability, the consensus was to retain the existing fees to cover anticipated financial shortfalls. The council considered simplifying the fee structure by setting a flat rate for members aged two and above, which was favored for its administrative ease and fairness.

The council also examined the possibility of senior discounts, debating whether age or financial need should determine eligibility. While some advocated for a reduced registration fee for seniors, others suggested a need-based financial assistance program, supported by proof of financial need, to ensure equitable access.

Another noteworthy discussion involved a no-refund policy for pool memberships, aligning with practices from other pools. Exceptions for medical emergencies were considered, but the emphasis remained on maintaining a straightforward policy. Financial assistance for families in need was another focus, with suggestions to better promote existing programs. This included adding QR codes and contact information for social workers in promotional materials to improve accessibility.

Communication issues were addressed, particularly regarding notifications through the Daysmart registration system. Members expressed the need for text alerts instead of emails, citing higher engagement rates for text notifications. This change would ensure timely updates about pool closures due to weather conditions.

The council also tackled pool equipment rules, with pushback against the prohibition of snorkels, water weights, and kickboards. A proposal to designate specific lanes for water exercises, particularly benefitting seniors and those needing physical therapy, gained support. However, concerns about potential disruptions from kickboards prompted suggestions for case-by-case approval.

Private swim lessons were proposed to promote swim safety and community engagement, with scheduling to avoid conflicts with lap swimmers. The possibility of offering free lessons, as done in the past, was positively received.

The policy on guest passes was debated, with a push to eliminate expiration dates, allowing flexibility in usage. Online purchases of guest passes were considered, with QR codes facilitating transactions. Although concerns were raised about the implications of not registering for subsequent seasons, the general sentiment favored increased accessibility.

Discussions on facility upgrades encompassed a wide range of topics, from pool lights requiring professional installation to the cleanliness of the canteen area. Suggestions for mosquito control, new chairs, and playground enhancements were made, with the potential for grant funding to support these improvements. The idea of a pavilion for private events was introduced as a future revenue source, addressing the lack of affordable rental spaces in the area.