Representatives from Wesson and Samson Engineers explained the updated proposal, which now includes a continuous bridge instead of two separate structures, aiming to reduce overall wetland disturbance by 4,267 square feet. However, this new design would necessitate the removal of 17 trees and result in a permanent loss of approximately 170 feet of wetland area. The proposal sparked a discussion among commission members, with differing opinions on the adequacy of the provided information and the potential environmental benefits of the project.

One commission member raised concerns about the adequacy of the engineering specifications and expressed hesitation to approve the amended order without a review. In contrast, another member highlighted the potential environmental benefits of the proposed changes, arguing that it could minimize ecological disruption compared to the original plan. The applicant’s representatives reiterated their willingness to cooperate with the commission’s requests for further information and a peer review.

The commission’s discussion underscored a balancing act between environmental protection and development, with members weighing the merits of the proposed amendments against the need for precise specifications. This discourse highlighted the importance of careful consideration and collaboration in projects that intersect with sensitive ecological areas.

In a related discussion, the commission delved into a proposed drilling operation associated with the solar project, emphasizing the need for clarity on whether the drilling would be “wet” or “dry” and how spoils would be managed. Concerns were voiced regarding the potential presence of bedrock, which could impact the bridge installation. The commission agreed that further information and peer review were necessary before moving forward.

The meeting also touched on the necessity of site visits to visualize the proposed bridge’s placement. Flags marking the bridge’s beginning, middle, and end were suggested to provide a clearer understanding of the project’s scope. This site visit was tentatively scheduled for early October, with members expressing their willingness to participate.

In other matters, the commission continued a public hearing for Clemway Solar LLC’s ground-mounted solar arrays in a sensitive environmental area, including bordering vegetated wetlands. This hearing was postponed to the next meeting on October 8. Additionally, the commission reviewed a request for determination by Joseph and Megan Barrett for constructing a single-family home on Evergreen Drive. The proposed work involved minimal grading and clearing, mostly for septic system installation, and was approved with a negative determination.

Another notable discussion involved a residential development project near Gammon’s Road, presented by David M. Deinion from Schneider Deion and Leon. This proposal involved constructing a single-family dwelling on nearly 20 acres, with site work within a 100-foot buffer zone of a vegetated wetland. The commission approved the order of conditions after reviewing the plans and addressing public comments regarding visibility from neighboring properties.

The meeting also addressed ongoing concerns about an unkempt project site on Sloum Street. A commission member reported issues with erosion control and sediment entering the river after heavy rains, expressing frustration over the project’s management. The member emphasized the importance of compliance with environmental regulations and committed to monitoring the situation closely.

Finally, the commission discussed the hiring process for a new agent, with four applications under review. A member questioned the decision to halt advertising for the position. Despite one highly recommended applicant, concerns remained about finding a suitable candidate within the current pool.