The Hamiltons expressed their dissatisfaction with the city’s handling of the restoration of their 1895 historic property. They criticized the previous contractor, Patriot, for substandard work that failed to meet historical standards, particularly concerning the roof installation. The Hamiltons sought a non-competitive procurement process to expedite the restoration, citing federal code 200.320C4 as justification. They also expressed a preference for McKe Renovations, a local contractor experienced with historic buildings, to take over the project.

The dialogue illustrated the frustrations tied to the city’s procurement policies, with the Hamiltons arguing that delays had exceeded a year and were compounded by misleading information from city officials regarding their ability to select a contractor. They emphasized that their concerns were not just about the historical integrity of their home but also about avoiding further legal entanglements. The vice mayor acknowledged the complex situation but stressed the need to adhere to procurement regulations while exploring all possible resolutions.

Compounding the Hamiltons’ frustrations were the technical issues related to the roof’s ventilation system. City grant consultant Mr. Jenkins clarified that the current Cobra ridge vent met code requirements, but the Hamiltons preferred a more efficient raised ridge vent to ensure the longevity of their home’s materials.

In parallel, the meeting addressed the Community Redevelopment Agency’s budget for fiscal year 2026. The CRA director presented a resolution for the adoption of the budget, noting a significant increment value of $641 million from an original base value of $299 million. The total TIF revenue was projected at $6.9 million, contributing to a total revenue of $20.5 million. A substantial portion of the budget, 88%, was earmarked for infrastructure projects, including a $10.7 million allocation for Guy Davis Park and $4 million for Sitman drainage and sidewalk improvements.

Board members scrutinized various line items, particularly a $300,000 redevelopment agreement with Aan Leah and Atlantic Point Marina, part of a real estate accelerator pilot program. Questions arose about the financial arrangements and incentives for new development projects. The discussion revealed complexities in balancing the budget, with some funds drawn from reserves to meet project needs.

Public comments further highlighted concerns over the city’s accountability in grant processes. Robin Cartwright criticized the city’s focus on assigning blame rather than acknowledging its shortcomings in managing grants. They emphasized the need for the city to recognize its role as project manager and urged for constructive dialogue to resolve issues.

The meeting also addressed the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) housing rehabilitation grant program, where board members advocated for constructive dialogue over conflict. The Hamiltons’ historic site preservation efforts were acknowledged, and they were invited to present a video highlighting the community’s historical aspects.