Central to the meeting was the proposal by GSH Incorporated to transform a property currently housing a three-unit dwelling into a more extensive affordable housing development, specifically targeting low-income veterans. The plan involves subdividing the existing property to construct a duplex, each unit offering affordable housing. The new structure would feature two affordable units, each with a designated parking space, and would replace a detached garage on the site.

Michael Goldstein, a civil engineer, provided testimony on the technical aspects of the proposed project. Goldstein detailed the dimensions and layout of the duplex, measuring 65 feet by 18 feet, with plans for a porch and a driveway. He addressed parking requirements, modifications to existing parking conditions, and the need to remove the detached garage. Goldstein also discussed the installation of a dry well to manage stormwater runoff and substantial landscaping efforts to mitigate visual impacts on neighboring properties.

Despite these assurances, the proposal faced scrutiny from both the board and the public. Residents expressed concerns about the impact of the development on traffic, lighting, and water runoff. Lisa Yuber, a resident living adjacent to the proposed changes, questioned the effectiveness of the planned landscaping to mitigate issues related to headlights and noise. Similarly, Carla Yanni raised concerns about the adequacy of the drainage plans, particularly given the significant increase in impervious surface coverage proposed for the site.

The planner responded to these concerns by explaining the drainage strategy, which includes a subsurface infiltration basin designed to capture runoff. However, Yanni and other residents remained skeptical about whether these measures would sufficiently mitigate the increased runoff and its potential effects on their properties.

Parking arrangements were another prominent issue discussed during the meeting. The development’s current plan includes separate driveways for the proposed units, a decision motivated by a desire to maintain independence from neighboring properties. The board debated the feasibility and efficiency of a shared driveway, which could potentially reduce impervious coverage. However, concerns were raised about the practicality of coordinating parking among tenants with varying schedules and vehicle ownership. The board emphasized the need for a setup that would adequately serve current tenants and potential future market renters after the deed restrictions expired.

The meeting also touched on the project’s compliance with local ordinances concerning stormwater management. A board member expressed uncertainty about the standards applicable to single-family homes and inquired whether other homes in Highland Park adhered to similar standards for dry wells. The engineer clarified that the development does not qualify as a development under local ordinances, directing attention to the borough’s ordinance rather than broader standards. The board requested revisions to the plans to better address stormwater management concerns, particularly regarding the potential for flooding during heavy storms.

In addition to these technical discussions, the board explored the broader implications of the proposed development on the community. Lewis Delucia, representing Garden State Home, provided an overview of the organization and its goals. He explained that the project is funded through a county program using federal funds and assured the board that the borough would receive credits for the new affordable units. Delucia also clarified the project’s compliance with adaptability requirements for affordable housing, emphasizing its accessibility for individuals with disabilities.