The Shields’ petition, docket number BOA09 182501, requested permission to allow an existing building site on class three soil, classified as prime, rather than the mandated class four through eight soils as per county ordinance. The property, predominantly composed of non-prime soils, did not necessitate a conditional use permit due to its size, exceeding 40 acres. The petitioners intended to sell the property in two parts, designating parcel A as residential and parcel B as woodland, with plans to create an easement for access. Despite support from Wiscoy Township, county staff recommended denial based on conflicts with ordinance findings aimed at protecting prime soils.

Throughout the discussion, the board deliberated on the economic motivations driving the Shields’ request, including the potential for increased property value if sold in parts. A representative, Chad Garteski, highlighted offers contingent on the variance’s approval and noted that the property could be more lucrative when divided. However, the board stressed that economic benefit alone did not justify a variance, as practical difficulties must stem from unique property circumstances, not self-created conditions. The board’s unanimous decision to deny the variance reflected its careful consideration of zoning principles and the broader implications for land use in Winona County.

The meeting also addressed another variance petition from Daniel, Kathy, and Robert Hire, related to a proposed dwelling near a feedlot in New Hartford Township. The Hires sought relief from both the prime soil standard and a 1,000-foot feedlot setback requirement, proposing a dwelling setback of only 205 feet. Despite receiving support from the township, the board scrutinized whether the variance criteria were met, particularly the existence of practical difficulties and the variance’s impact on the locality’s character.

During the discussion, Robert Hire articulated his family’s connection to the land and desire to return to a rural lifestyle. He referenced the comprehensive plan’s encouragement of housing development outside recognized agricultural areas and pointed to similar variances granted in the county. However, neighboring farm owners, Steve and Jared Weezer, opposed the request, citing potential disruptions to livestock and agricultural operations due to the dwelling’s proximity. The board weighed these concerns, ultimately reinforcing the necessity of adhering to zoning rules designed to protect both agricultural and public interests.

Additionally, the board considered a variance request for a solar energy system at the Ridgeway Community School, proposed by Joanie Danzenberg. The request sought to reduce the setback from a rear property line for a solar array, intended to support the school’s electrical needs. Despite support from nearby property owners and the project’s alignment with energy demands, the board denied the variance, emphasizing the need to comply with zoning regulations and the potential impact on surrounding uses.

The meeting concluded with a proposal for a conditional use permit involving a 31-acre split from a 71-acre parcel of predominantly prime soils. The board evaluated the proposal’s implications for agricultural use and future land management, ultimately approving the application with conditions to preserve agricultural integrity.