The public comments began with residents raising alarm over the potential impact of increased gate closures on emergency response times. Concerns were expressed that frequent closures could delay emergency vehicles, particularly on the west side of town. Questions were raised about how the town plans to coordinate with police and fire departments to mitigate these impacts. The conversation underscored the urgency for effective contingency plans to ensure community safety.

Residents also criticized the MBTA’s presentation of information related to the turnback track, describing sound study results as incomplete and misleading. Concerns were voiced about the integrity of data shared by MBTA project managers, with calls for an emergency town meeting to ensure decisions are based on complete and verifiable information. The need for transparency was a recurring theme, with residents demanding clarity on how the project would affect their neighborhoods and the environment.

Environmental justice implications were also highlighted, with residents pointing out that communities near the train tracks had not been adequately consulted. Discussions about the project’s potential to increase pollution and emissions, particularly nitrogen oxides, were prevalent. There was a call for independent audits to validate reporting on emissions and emergency responses, with residents emphasizing the necessity for a transit committee to closely monitor developments.

Concerns about the MBTA’s proposed changes extended to financial and operational aspects. Questions about ridership data and the financial implications of additional trains were raised, with skepticism about the accuracy of these figures. The community sought assurances that the project would not exacerbate the MBTA’s existing debt levels.

The discussion also touched on the MBTA’s decision to use renewable diesel, which was described as more cost-effective but raised concerns about pollution and health implications. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of transparency in data collection and the adequacy of acoustic studies, calling for more comprehensive assessments to address community concerns.

As the meeting continued, the Board also discussed the establishment of a commission on disabilities, emphasizing the need for a structured approach to address the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in Reading. The proposed commission would serve in an advisory capacity to the municipal government, providing insights on the needs of the disabled community and helping to ensure compliance with relevant laws.

In addition to these topics, the Board addressed a new restaurant liquor license application for Reading Forno LLC, a business set to open in Reading. The proposed restaurant, offering authentic Italian cuisine, would replace a national franchise with a local small business, aligning with the town’s goals for local business development. The application was met with enthusiasm, with the Board voting to approve the annual all-alcohol restaurant liquor license.

The meeting also included discussions on the town’s recycling and trash collection contracts, with focus on proposals from Waste Management and Republic Services. The conversation highlighted the importance of cost, convenience, and the basic needs of residents, with a call for both vendors to provide their best offers. The need for innovative recycling solutions and transparency in pricing was emphasized as the town navigates its waste management strategy.