Heather F’s application generated considerable discussion as the board reviewed the necessity of relocating a fence to comply with township ordinances. The concern was the potential need to remove trees to meet a 40-foot setback requirement from the property line on North Randolphville Road. The board clarified that placing the fence behind the pine trees would satisfy the requirements without necessitating tree removal. The history of the fence, installed before Heather F purchased the property in 2011, prompted queries about the inspection process at the time of the sale and whether the legality of the fence had been communicated. One member highlighted the importance of adhering to township ordinances, stating, “If the fence was illegal then, it’s illegal now.” The board proposed alternatives, including reducing the fence height to four feet, which would allow it to remain in its current position. Ultimately, a timeline was established for the required changes, with a deadline set for spring 2026. The board approved the application with these amendments, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the natural landscape.

Lyanna Commandis’ application for a variance regarding air conditioning units on Highland A also drew attention. The setback requirement of 10 feet included the AC units, which Commandis and her builder, her father, had not realized before applying for the final Certificate of Occupancy. Jonathan, possibly a board member, acknowledged the hardship posed by the undersized lot, leading the board to approve the variance unanimously. The board noted that the decision would be memorialized in writing at the next meeting, allowing Commandis to retain the units in their current location due to the logistical challenges of relocating them.

Yaharia Gonzalez sought a variance to retain a fence installed before she purchased her home in 2019. The board required a memorandum of restriction. Gonzalez agreed to this condition, and the board committed to assisting her with the necessary documentation for permit issuance. After confirming no public comments, the board approved the variance unanimously.

Jorge and Rosie Mina presented an application for a variance to maintain a fence that had been changed from wood to vinyl without a permit in 2006. They requested a 12-foot setback instead of the required 25-foot setback from the property line. Jonathan noted that changing the fence type without a permit constituted a violation, and the board emphasized the need for a permit for the covered patio, which lacked documentation. The Minas expressed understanding and agreed to pursue the necessary permits. The board approved the application with the discussed conditions, receiving unanimous support.