The council’s decision to deny the parking variance for Bridge View Apartments was the focal point of the meeting. The developers had requested a variance to provide 66 parking spaces, falling short of the city ordinance requirement of 76 spaces. The planning commission had previously recommended against the variance, noting that the issue stemmed from the developer’s design choices and could be rectified through adjustments. Despite acknowledging the practical difficulties faced by the developer, the council voted against the variance, aligning with the planning commission’s stance that adhering to the ordinance was essential.

The debate over the variance revealed differing opinions among council members. Some emphasized the importance of sticking to the planning commission’s recommendations and maintaining the integrity of city regulations. Others noted the potential benefits of the development to Zumbrota’s growth and housing needs. However, concerns about setting a precedent for relying on external parking and the potential impact on future developments ultimately swayed the council’s decision.

In a related discussion, the council narrowly approved a resolution to increase the parking ratio for another development to 1.74 spaces per unit, up from the previously approved one space per unit. This decision was made following a motion and second, resulting in a 3-2 vote. A council member who voted against the resolution expressed concerns about deviating from committee recommendations but acknowledged the potential advantages of increased housing capacity.

The meeting also addressed the rezoning of 211 Walnut Street, set to become the site of a new veterinary clinic. The council unanimously approved the rezoning from agricultural to Commercial 2, following the planning commission’s public hearing and recommendation. This decision aligns with the city’s comprehensive plan.

Another topic was the ongoing recodification process for city ordinances. An update was provided, indicating that an attorney had been assigned to review the legal aspects, with progress anticipated in the new year. The council expressed confidence that the allocated funds were being used effectively.

Chief Jeff Kim brought attention to the issue of radio-read meters, highlighting that some residents had declined the installation due to personal concerns. The council discussed potential fees for manual meter readings, similar to practices in other communities, to address non-compliance. A proposed $100 monthly fee for those refusing the meters was mentioned, with the council anticipating a clearer estimate of non-compliance by late November or early December. The goal is to incorporate applicable fees into the city’s schedule by January.

The council also acknowledged community efforts, such as the maintenance of the walking path and the installation of a new sign at Cover Bridge Park. Positive feedback from residents was shared, with council members expressing gratitude for the collaborative efforts of local businesses and volunteers. This appreciation extended to the planning and zoning committee, recognizing their voluntary contributions and the challenges of recruiting members for city boards. Discussions about a new application page on the city website aimed at streamlining recruitment for open positions.