The most debated issue of the meeting was the proposal to adjust the salary of Town Clerk Liz Greenale. The proposal sparked extensive discussion, with arguments both for and against the increase. One speaker praised Greenale’s performance during a recent election recount and argued for the salary increase, asserting that her role and experience warranted compensation at the higher end of the salary range. Another speaker emphasized the need for fairness across all town departments and suggested that salary adjustments should not be made in isolation. The finance committee recommended postponing the decision to allow for a review of all town compensation policies. Despite the recommendation, the motion to postpone the salary increase failed, and the committee ultimately voted in favor of the raise. This decision highlighted the ongoing tension between immediate recognition of individual contributions and the broader need for equitable salary practices.

Concerns over town financial planning were also a focal point. The committee discussed the projection of a $1 million deficit for the fiscal year 2027, attributed to rising costs and the end of certain grants. The finance committee warned of the challenges posed by these fiscal realities and highlighted the need for sustainable budgeting. The committee recommended using a portion of the estimated $3.5 million in free cash for capital expenditures, cautioning against relying on this volatile revenue for operational budgets. There was also a recommendation to allocate funds to the pension stabilization fund and a water main replacement project.

Infrastructure needs were another significant concern, with discussions on the condition of school roofs and the Department of Public Works (DPW) facilities. The committee proposed a $1.35 million appropriation for roof repairs at Placentino and Miller schools, contingent on a grant from the Massachusetts School Building Authority. The need for solar-ready roofs to qualify for funding was emphasized, and the timeline for repairs was discussed, with hopes to commence work by summer if funding was secured. Additionally, the poor state of the DPW facilities prompted a proposal for a new facility at the Art Street location. The urgency of replacing the outdated structures was stressed, with the new location expected to offer operational efficiency and eliminate acquisition costs.

Drinking water safety emerged as a issue, with community members expressing concerns over PFAS contamination. The town has received settlement funds from a class action lawsuit against companies responsible for water contamination. The funds are earmarked for PFAS remediation efforts, although the current PFAS levels in Holliston remain below reportable limits.

The meeting concluded with discussions on several zoning and bylaw amendments. A proposal to change bylaws concerning the timeline for finance committee report submissions sparked debate, reflecting broader concerns about governance processes and interdepartmental collaboration. The motion for further study of this proposal was passed.