At the forefront of the meeting was the proposed data center by a company known as “Tract.” Residents expressed their frustration and discontent with the council’s handling of the project, particularly its placement near residential areas. Community members argued that the city’s zoning regulations and the project lacked clarity and proper categorization. The data center’s classification within the Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial (MUCI) zoning district sparked debate, with residents questioning why it did not fall under the “heavy industrial” category.

One speaker highlighted the disconnect between the project and the city’s zoning intentions, which are designed to separate industrial activities from residential areas to mitigate issues such as noise, traffic, and pollution. Concerns were raised about the lack of a clear definition for “hyperscale technology park” within the city’s regulations, which some residents believed should be distinct from traditional data centers. The speaker also pointed out that other municipalities, such as Cannon Falls, had successfully designated similar projects as heavy industrial.

Further criticism was directed at the council’s perceived inaction, with residents asserting that not enough had been done to address community concerns. The absence of proactive engagement from city staff and council members regarding alternative designs that could accommodate the data center without compromising residential areas was a key point of contention. The call for a moratorium on the project was a recurring theme, as residents advocated for time to conduct a review of zoning ordinances and ensure community safety and environmental goals are met.

Another speaker emphasized the potential risks associated with data centers, including fire hazards and their significant electrical consumption. They urged the council to reconsider its approach and implement a moratorium to align future developments with community safety and environmental objectives. The speaker referenced Minnesota statute 462.355, which permits temporary freezes on certain types of developments, advocating for its application in this case to prevent significant public harm.

The council addressed the concerns raised during public comments, with a council member clarifying that a moratorium would not be legally permissible given that the project had already received approval. They warned against actions that could result in lawsuits, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal frameworks. Despite acknowledging the concerns, the council member reiterated that no actionable item was before the council that could alter the approvals already granted for the project.

In addition to the data center discussions, the meeting included public comments supporting an upcoming school operating levy. Residents shared personal stories highlighting the positive impact of the Farmington school district on their families, particularly for students with special needs. The speakers emphasized the importance of funding to maintain essential programming and support for students, urging the community to recognize the necessity of the levy.

The council also reviewed a proposal for a new skate park agreement with Spawn Ranch, Inc. The proposal outlined plans for constructing a permanent skate park at Fely Fields in Rambling River Park, with a budget of $1 million funded through a combination of grants and community project funds. The project aims to prioritize accessibility and inclusivity, with public input meetings scheduled to gather community feedback on the design.

Lastly, the council addressed routine matters such as the certification of delinquent municipal services to property taxes for 2026, with staff recommending the certification of unpaid balances totaling $252,846.70. The council also provided updates on various community events and maintenance projects, including roadway improvements on Flagstaff Avenue and upcoming events like the annual Turkey Bingo.