The application concerning 610 East Pleasant Street drew discussion as the board examined a request to modify a previously approved site plan for a solar array installation. The applicants, Julia Feny and her son Samuel Shanki, sought a special permit to install ground-mounted solar panels. Samuel explained that the installation was necessary due to shading issues from large trees that prevented rooftop installation. He informed the board that a licensed construction company and solar installation contract had been secured to facilitate the project, which aims to provide solar energy for their home.

During discussions, a board member who attended the site visit provided insights into the observations made, noting that the solar display location was not visible from the street and only minimally visible from a neighboring property. The installation’s height was compared to an existing shed that would be removed, with assurances that the solar array would have a limited visual impact on the neighborhood.

Board members reached a consensus supporting the application, highlighting the absence of public objections. Samuel confirmed that the solar array would connect directly to the grid using net metering, with no battery storage involved. With no public comments opposing the project, the board transitioned from public hearing to public meeting on the application, approving it unanimously after reviewing zoning bylaw criteria. The proposal was deemed to align with zoning regulations, did not involve demolition, and would not alter the building’s exterior.

Another discussion centered on the petition for a property on High Street, where the applicant sought to convert an open porch into a bedroom. The request had been continued from a previous meeting due to safety concerns with the parking area. The applicant, represented by David Buren from Legacy Counselors PC, awaited feedback from the fire department regarding the updated site plan. This led to another request for continuance, which the board granted with stipulations for timely submissions in future.

A board member conveyed information from discussions with the fire prevention officer, noting no anticipated significant code enforcement issues concerning fire truck access. It was emphasized that parking in the driveway rather than on the road was preferable for access. The board agreed on a continuation to December 11th, with a firm stance on future submission timelines.

The board also deliberated on a special permit for converting a residential structure in a specific zoning area. The proposal did not involve physical changes to the existing structure and would connect to public sewer services. The board reviewed suitability and compatibility within the neighborhood. The landscaping was deemed satisfactory, and no additional exterior lighting was proposed. The board approved the special permit, confirming alignment with the town’s master plan and green energy goals.

In administrative matters, feedback on the town manager’s performance was briefly discussed, concluding that individual responses were preferable due to limited board interaction with the town manager. Additionally, the board agreed to cancel the November 13 meeting due to a lack of petitions.