Lucas Praau from the Reading Turnback Track Committee (RTC) opened the discussion by thanking the board and attendees for their engagement. Praau, along with other committee members, articulated the community’s strong opposition to the MBTA’s proposed track location, which would introduce 28 new train trips daily. Concerns were raised about increased noise, vibration, and pollution impacting residential neighborhoods, conservation areas, and vulnerable populations, such as the elderly living near the tracks. Aaron Perry further explained that the proposed 4,500-foot track expansion aimed to double train movements, leading to frequent road closures and exacerbated traffic congestion without adequate environmental assessments or noise barriers.

The environmental and health impacts of the project were a primary focus, with residents and board members alike raising alarms about the increased emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), pollutants linked to respiratory issues. Despite the MBTA’s claims of decreasing emissions, the projected additional 24.1 tons of NOx emissions raised concerns. A representative highlighted the personal impact of such pollution, comparing it to “45 lawnmowers running simultaneously” and noting the moral obligation to protect vulnerable populations near schools and assisted living facilities. Questions were also raised about the reliability of the MBTA’s sound studies, which reportedly excluded critical data.

Health and safety concerns were further underscored by Alicia Gallagher, a professional nurse, who emphasized the negative impact on emergency vehicle travel due to increased train crossings. She stressed that delays in emergency response times could jeopardize patient outcomes. Multiple residents echoed this sentiment, highlighting the detrimental effects on both health services and traffic patterns.

Public comment revealed a spectrum of community perspectives, with residents like Pat Kryley questioning the enforcement of idling regulations and David Kumido expressing skepticism about the project’s financial viability. Linda Russo and Debbie Harris shared personal accounts of living near the tracks, voicing concerns over noise pollution and quality of life. Meanwhile, Kate Marcowski, an 11-year-old student, articulated worries about air quality degradation affecting local conservation areas.

The proposed project’s classification and associated environmental reviews also came under scrutiny. Critics argued that the project should be considered new development due to its proximity to conservation areas, necessitating stricter reviews. Concerns were raised about the project’s potential to undermine local conservation efforts, such as the Mallet Psalms and Morgan Conservation Project, which aim to improve stormwater management and restore wetlands.

Discussions with residents revealed a call for accountability, thoughtful development, and transparency from the MBTA. The board voted unanimously to oppose the project based on its location, urging continued dialogue and consideration of community needs.