The board’s debate over Flock’s ALPR proposal was sparked by community concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse of collected data. Members of the public, including a resident from Precinct 6, voiced skepticism about the safeguards in place and the potential for Flock’s technology to be used beyond its intended public safety purposes. Concerns were amplified by past instances where Flock was reported to have shared data with ICE, leading to heightened fears about unintended consequences and community trust issues.

Specific concerns were raised about the data ownership and the possibility of federal agencies accessing the information collected by the ALPRs. Participants questioned whether the town’s engagement with Flock aligns with Brookline’s values and legal obligations, especially given the potential for data sharing with outside law enforcement agencies.

Following this heated discussion, the board also addressed a proposal for a new bylaw targeting nuisance lighting. The amendment aimed to regulate excessive residential lighting, a frequent source of neighborhood complaints. The proposed bylaw would establish new standards for lighting intensity and installation to mitigate light pollution while empowering residents to address issues directly with their neighbors before escalating to the town. However, concerns were voiced about the potential for increased complaints and the strain on enforcement resources. The board recognized the need for a balanced approach, considering both residential and commercial lighting impacts.

Additionally, the board explored the potential of warrant article 9, which proposed a notification program for tenants concerning their rights, particularly regarding eviction processes. The article sought to establish mechanisms for tenants to receive timely information about their rights, especially during eviction proceedings. Despite these challenges, the proposal was seen as an essential step towards improving tenant awareness and support during housing instability.

The meeting also included discussions on fiscal matters, including the approval of a budget amendment for fiscal year 2026. This amendment proposed using revenue from ride-sharing services to support senior transportation programs. The board acknowledged the financial implications of these adjustments, recognizing the potential tax relief for residents due to favorable debt service assumptions.