The meeting commenced with an examination of the Board of Health’s decision to mandate IAS for certain construction scenarios that could increase nitrogen flow. The committee expressed concerns over the implications for property owners in areas slated for future sewer connections but currently unfunded. This situation was likened to “burying a brand new car in your backyard,” highlighting the potential for wasted investment if properties eventually connect to a sewer system. The dialogue explored the 20-year timeline for sewer infrastructure completion, calling for a more concrete plan to integrate IAS and sewer projects.

There was a broad consensus that the Board of Health’s regulation, though well-meaning, might have technical flaws due to a lack of a comprehensive town plan for water quality management. The committee emphasized the necessity for clearer communication and collaboration with the Board of Health. Concerns about a hidden agenda driving the Board’s actions were voiced, reflecting frustration with the pace of the Water Quality Management Committee’s efforts.

Financial implications were a focal point, particularly the dual burden on property owners required to install IAS and later connect to sewers. The committee discussed the possibility of a tax on new construction to fund nitrogen management. Engaging town financial experts to ensure fair cost distribution between IAS installations and sewer connections was deemed essential.

The discussion also acknowledged other nitrogen management strategies, including oysters and inlet widening, but stressed the urgency of executing existing plans. The potential for an outfall project was viewed positively, with plans for a pilot project involving new technology. However, integrating these varied approaches effectively remains uncertain.

The committee recognized its role in advocating for equitable financial solutions and seeking collaboration with other town entities and communities. Members discussed statewide legislative efforts to provide tax credits or funding for IAS installations, emphasizing the importance of lobbying for favorable regulations to alleviate financial burdens on homeowners.

A detailed examination of the efficacy of IAS revealed concerns about meeting necessary nitrogen concentration levels. The town’s Board of Health regulations allow for a mass balance demonstration, permitting systems to demonstrate compliance even if concentration targets are unmet. Disparities in cost and obligations between homeowners required to install IAS versus those connecting to sewer systems were a point of contention.

The committee acknowledged the need for a comprehensive model for IAS funding and sewering, identifying the absence of a fair cost-distribution model as a issue. Involving economic experts in watershed planning was recommended to ensure financial implications are fully considered. A member stressed the need for fairness in cost-sharing, while another cautioned against framing fairness as absolute, noting that regulations apply to new constructions or significant modifications.

Funding for IAS was also debated, with participants asserting that town budget commitments must evolve to accommodate these systems. The town has the ability to revisit regulations and financial obligations as more data becomes available.

The committee’s evolving role relative to the wastewater division of the Department of Public Works (DPW) was discussed. The chair urged members to consider the committee’s purpose and how it aligns with the town’s broader responsibilities. Legislative efforts related to septic systems, including a proposed change to the Title 5 septic tax credit, were highlighted, with the committee encouraged to engage stakeholders to support the bill.

Performance data from various wastewater treatment systems was reviewed, raising concerns about systems not meeting nitrogen limits. The permeable reactive barrier (PRB) project for Snug Harbor in West Falmouth was also discussed, with funding approval received. The committee plans to focus on community engagement and securing a matching grant for the project.