The primary topic of discussion was a proposal from Weston and Samson to oversee the stormwater management for three housing lots on Horton Street, with services that would typically be performed by a stormwater agent, a position currently vacant in Dighton. At a projected cost of $9,810, or $3,270 per house, the proposal includes inspections by a qualified professional engineer to ensure compliance with conservation, planning, and health requirements. The commission emphasized the importance of securing this contract, with funds to be deposited in a 53G account before any work can commence. A pending contract approval from the town administrator is also required.

The commission acknowledged the absence of a stormwater agent as a significant obstacle, necessitating reliance on external engineering services to fulfill these responsibilities. Members noted that the proposal from Weston and Samson aims to replace the previous stormwater agent’s duties. Additionally, fees for stormwater permits, set at $250 per lot, are to be collected by the Board of Health.

The conversation also covered ongoing site visits and inspections for a new housing project, including a site visit that involved multiple commission members. While progress was noted, concerns about stormwater management and potential violations were discussed. The commission agreed on the need to coordinate efforts between the stormwater commission and the conservation commission, especially for one lot facing wetland issues that the conservation commission is addressing. It was determined that the lead authority would be based on the severity of any violations encountered.

The commission voted unanimously to accept the proposal from Weston and Samson and forward it to the town administrator for contract issuance. Public comments during the meeting also brought attention to the status of Brook Street, where concerns were raised about planted vegetation on a berm and a water basin reportedly holding water for an extended period. The commission committed to investigating these issues further, including contacting relevant parties for updates.

In addition to the primary topics, the commission also discussed the operation of solar panels in the area. The commission acknowledged the need for further clarity regarding the solar panels’ status and their integration into the local infrastructure. Given the absence of a current stormwater agent to conduct regular evaluations, the commission noted that periodic checks were being made, particularly following significant storms.

The challenges of maintaining oversight without a dedicated stormwater agent were further highlighted in discussions about ongoing monitoring and compliance with environmental standards, particularly in light of upcoming MS4 regulations. Although ongoing monitoring is not yet mandated, it is expected to involve third-party inspections and reporting in the future. The commission plans to invite representatives from the housing projects under discussion to the next meeting to provide updates on their progress and any potential violations.

The meeting also addressed procedural elements, such as the need for a public hearing regarding proposed bylaws before a town meeting, and the distinction between public hearings for bylaws and public meetings for regulations. Members expressed the importance of keeping relevant boards informed and ensuring adherence to regulations. The meeting concluded with the approval of minutes from the previous meeting and a discussion about the need for 2026 calendars, with concerns about potential delays similar to those experienced in the previous year.