The meeting featured a detailed debate on the proposal to remove hazardous trees near Long Lake Park, instigated by a local church’s request following a tree falling near its structure. The discussion focused on whether four trees, including a spruce and three pines, required removal due to potential risks. This issue was complicated by confusion over the trees’ location within the conservation buffer zone, as initially, seven trees had been flagged for removal. The Commission underscored the need for a thorough assessment of the trees’ health and their potential danger before making any decisions. The members expressed discomfort with proceeding without a clear evaluation, stressing the necessity for proper identification of the trees involved.

Additionally, the meeting addressed a successful aquatic vegetation management report for four ponds earlier in the year, with questions raised concerning the status of treatments for other bodies of water like Long Lake and Spectacle Pond. These had not received treatments due to unmet permitting windows.

The meeting also reviewed the proposed construction project on Park Drive, presented by residents Mike Leuk and Allison Fortune. Their plan involves adding a 12×12 room and a 4×12 covered porch to their existing structure. The proposal, notable for its use of helical piers to minimize disturbance, included erosion control measures to protect a nearby 50-foot zone adjacent to a small stream. The Commission scrutinized the project’s proximity to the stream, the grading and drainage patterns, and the potential impact on the septic system. Though the project appeared straightforward, the Commission awaited a Department of Environmental Protection file number before proceeding, with plans to continue discussions on November 18.

Simultaneously, the Commission examined a revised construction plan from the Citizens Battery Group and Warren Cameron, aimed at clarifying previous confusions regarding a containment area. The updated plan, described as a “bathtub,” was praised for its clarity and alignment with the Commission’s expectations. The discussion included public concerns, such as fishing access near the construction site. Jerry Kavalo, a member of the audience, advocated for maintaining fishing access on the current side of the brook, emphasizing its unique qualities and the presence of brown trout. Despite these concerns, the Commission focused on the permit at hand, with the Light and Water Department suggesting an alternative location for public access across the brook.

The Commission emphasized incorporating rigorous operational and maintenance requirements into the construction project’s conditions, including regular training sessions between the Light and Water Department and the fire department. The importance of documenting the public nature of the project was highlighted to ensure accountability and oversight. There was a consensus on the need for regular updates from the Light and Water Department during construction through weekly status emails and annual training sessions.