The council engaged in a dialouge about the creation of a resident oversight board aimed at improving community confidence in police operations. The proposed board would conduct impartial investigations into complaints, contrasting with models that primarily review evidence without investigative authority. Questions arose regarding the implications of Massachusetts’ open meeting laws on the proposed board, with concerns about the conservative nature of the state’s public records laws complicating discussions around personnel issues.

Financial implications also emerged as a key topic, with potential costs associated with various operational models under scrutiny. The need for dedicated staff and training was emphasized, as existing personnel might not be equipped to handle the responsibilities of an investigatory model. Historical complaint numbers from similar-sized communities were considered, noting that while some communities experience an increase in complaints as public trust in oversight grows, others do not. The council estimated that Amherst might expect three to five complaints in the initial years, pending community awareness of the oversight board.

In addition to oversight board discussions, attention was given to the Community Responders for Equity, Safety, and Trust (Crest). Concerns were raised about Crest’s limited operational hours and its approach to dispatch calls. While Crest does not directly receive dispatch calls, they have a system in place to monitor relevant situations and respond accordingly. An example highlighted Crest’s ability to deescalate a situation at Triangle Park before police arrival. However, challenges regarding their ability to operate independently and respond effectively to incidents without police presence were discussed, with questions about the impact of Crest arriving after police potentially exacerbating community mistrust.

The conversation also touched on the broader definition of safety, incorporating access to essential resources and community connections. Crest’s role as an independent option beyond police and fire department responses was emphasized, particularly in mental health crisis situations. Despite progress in community engagement, concerns about Crest’s operational protocols and its independence from police influence persisted.

The meeting also reviewed financial projections for the upcoming fiscal year, with a focus on maintaining fiscal discipline amidst uncertainties surrounding federal and state funding. The town’s reliance on property tax revenue was discussed, with state aid and local receipts declining as a percentage of overall revenue. The need for fiscal stability and collaboration among decision-makers was highlighted, alongside concerns about rising health costs and road maintenance.

During public comments, community members voiced concerns about community safety, particularly highlighting issues faced by marginalized communities. The necessity for a resident oversight board with investigatory powers was emphasized, with calls for the council to address disparities in police interactions and prioritize recommendations from the Community Safety Working Group.