The commission deliberated on the implications of each proposal, particularly the expertise needed in wetlands and stormwater management. Given the Massachusetts ethics codes, smaller firms like LEC faced restrictions that could complicate their role as peer reviewers. A contingent vote was proposed, allowing LEC to secure the contract if they confirmed their structural capabilities. Should LEC express doubts, the commission would award the contract to Beals and Thomas. This approach aimed to ensure a thorough evaluation while keeping budget constraints in mind.

In parallel to these deliberations, the commission revisited the topic of 5 Auburn Street, which had been temporarily set aside. The discussion is scheduled to resume on November 20, following a request from the applicant to postpone. While substantive discussions were deferred, a list of questions was prepared to guide future conversations. The commission reinforced the importance of transparency throughout the process.

Attention then turned to the property on Everett Street, where a site visit had taken place. During the meeting, concerns were raised about the revised layout proposals for the site, which included both 12-unit and 15-unit development plans. The 15-unit proposal, though more compact, was perceived as inconsistent with cluster development principles, which emphasize open space preservation. The commission highlighted the potential environmental implications, particularly regarding stormwater management and the encroachment on protected wetlands. In response, Claire was tasked with drafting an updated comment letter for the planning board, emphasizing the need to adhere to stormwater bylaws and preserve the existing topography.

The conversation also covered the town’s recent submission to the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) under a new grant application process. The commission prioritized securing funding for the South Street Bridge, which is in deteriorating condition and poses a road safety risk. Additional proposals included a tree inventory and urban forest master plan. The commission acknowledged the significance of such initiatives, particularly as they align with broader efforts to update the town’s tree bylaw, which has not seen revisions since 2015.

Further discussions touched on invasive species management, with a proposal for a three-year plan targeting bittersweet and buckthorn. The initiative, estimated at just over $19,000, seeks funding approval from the town, aligning with the fiscal year 2027 budget. The commission expressed strong support for this endeavor, viewing invasive species management as a componet of their stewardship responsibilities. Additionally, the possibility of framing this work as eligible for Community Preservation Act (CPA) funding was explored, although it was acknowledged that this would require successful examples from other communities.

The meeting also addressed local efforts in maintaining the town forest, notably by a resident named Rich who has been active in debris removal. Safety concerns were raised regarding a fallen poplar tree, with the commission expressing appreciation for community involvement while emphasizing the importance of safety. The commission also discussed the Pine Hill Trail, where the Accept program’s students have contributed to trail maintenance. Plans for a celebration event were mentioned, recognizing the students’ efforts in restoring the trail.