The most notable discussion revolved around Ordinance 25-1576, which proposed a fee of $250 per month for residents who failed to replace their water meters as part of a grant-related project. The fee was intended to incentivize residents to schedule necessary replacements, with over 190 households still pending compliance. Council members engaged in a debate over the fairness and potential impact of the fee, particularly on seniors and those with fixed incomes. While some members argued the fee was excessive, others noted it targeted residents who had ignored repeated notifications to comply.

Concerns were raised about the burden on vulnerable populations, with calls for alternative options such as a refundable charge or an opt-out program, neither of which are currently available in Milltown. This issue has been under discussion for a significant period, highlighting the urgency of the matter in relation to leadline work and the potential for loss of grant funding.

Further complicating the water-related discussions, the council also introduced Ordinance 25-1577, which proposed a 3.5% increase in water rates, affecting sewer rates as well. This sparked questions regarding the financial implications for residents. The council also addressed the ongoing efforts to replace water meters and tackle lead service lines. The Department of Public Health has set a compliance deadline for 2031, but current staffing constraints mean it would take years to replace the remaining meters without external help.

In another key topic, the council debated changes to council rules concerning speaking times during meetings. A proposal to limit council members to five-minute speaking intervals was met with resistance, with arguments that it infringed upon First Amendment rights and stifled necessary dialogue. Councilman Frank Manco, who proposed the change, argued for consistency in time limits for both residents and council members. However, opponents of the change highlighted the need for discussion on borough issues and suggested that imposing a timer could impair effective governance.

The staffing of the clerk’s office also emerged as a contentious issue. The council considered resolution 2025-355, which authorized the hiring of a new deputy municipal clerk. Concerns were raised about the candidate’s qualifications, particularly the lack of the requisite two years of experience. Despite these concerns, the resolution was passed, reflecting ongoing challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel in municipal offices.

The meeting also included reports on community activities, law enforcement statistics, and infrastructure projects. Updates were provided on police operations, including the installation of a solar-powered speed radar sign and the acquisition of new rescue equipment by the fire department. The Department of Public Works reported progress on various infrastructure projects, including the Northbrook Drive and water main loop projects.

Public comments highlighted community concerns, with residents exissues with the audio quality of council meetings and speeding on local roads. The council agreed to address these matters.