The proposed hotel project is a development within the Tarpon Springs Downtown Redevelopment Area. The property is set to be sold “as is” for $25,000, with a closing scheduled for ten days post-approval of necessary documentation, including site plans and a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Board. The developer requested an irrevocable letter of credit instead of a traditional bond, which city staff approved.

The discussion also delved into the hotel’s architectural design, with particular focus on the building’s third floor and its impact on the surrounding area. Concerns were voiced over the potential noise from third-floor activities affecting hotel guests. Suggestions were made to set back the third floor to reduce its visual impact from street level. However, project representatives highlighted the challenge of such setbacks, as they would result in a loss of rooms along Tarpon Avenue.

Renderings of the building were requested to better visualize how it fits within the current landscape. The board emphasized the importance of a realistic depiction to inform the public about the project’s scope. The design includes continuous balconies and an open courtyard, contributing to a unique architectural feature. Commissioners expressed a need for additional perspectives, particularly from east and west angles, to assess the building’s integration with downtown Tarpon Springs.

Parking logistics emerged as a critical concern, given the potential need for a parking structure to accommodate the 24-room hotel. A proposal was made to designate four parking spaces on Court Street for guest unloading, with valet service suggested as a solution during large events. An underutilized parking lot behind an old bank building was identified as a potential asset, with suggestions to improve pedestrian access and encourage use, supporting foot traffic to nearby shops.

The hotel’s ground floor is designated for public use, transitioning from micro-retail spaces to a lounge environment with a small bar and seating areas. Indoor areas were suggested to accommodate patrons during hotter months.

Additional topics included the feasibility of a restaurant on the third floor, which was ultimately deemed unsuitable for the project’s operational goals. Concerns about public access to hotel facilities were discussed, with emphasis on maintaining a separation between guests and general public traffic. The conversation also touched upon public-private partnerships, with investing in the downtown area seen as a means to advance the city’s goals.

The meeting concluded with an agreement to continue discussions, particularly regarding the hotel’s design and parking strategies. The importance of ongoing collaboration and clear communication was underscored, with a proposal for individual meetings to address specific concerns and ideas. Enthusiasm for the project was expressed, alongside recognition of the need to address all raised issues before moving forward.