A key aspect of the meeting was the discussion around the emergency ordinance that sought to modify existing regulations for apartment buildings with 150 or more units. The proposed changes aimed to eliminate the requirement for off-duty police officers to be present at these complexes at all times, a point of significant concern for property owners and developers. Vice Mayor Joseph L. Kelley introduced the ordinance, with support from Commissioner Dr. Sherelean Bass, emphasizing the need to address the regulatory burden on property owners while maintaining resident safety.

Dr. Logan, representing the CEO of 10 North Group, a developer involved in a major rehabilitation project, expressed his apprehension during the public hearing. He stressed that failing to eliminate the contentious requirement could jeopardize the $25 million project, potentially leaving 216 residents without homes. Dr. Logan implored the commission to remove the problematic section of the ordinance, emphasizing the urgency and potential consequences of inaction.

The discussion also featured insights from Kareem Brantley, a property owner who voiced concerns about the ordinance’s impact on development and investment in Opa-Locka. He argued that the requirement inflated operational costs, discouraging developers from pursuing projects in the city. Brantley advocated for proactive crime prevention measures that would not impose undue burdens on property owners.

Commissioner Luis B. Santiago echoed concerns about the ordinance’s implications, drawing parallels to restrictive association rules that might not consider community impact. Santiago argued for a more balanced approach, urging the city administration and police department to take on more responsibility for crime prevention rather than placing the onus solely on landlords.

The city attorney, who arrived late to the meeting, attempted to clarify the ordinance’s intent. She explained that the emergency nature of the ordinance was to address life and safety issues, particularly regarding security requirements at larger apartment complexes. Despite confusion over the ordinance’s drafting, she reassured the commission that amendments could still be made to align the ordinance with the commission’s intentions.

Further complicating the debate was a discussion about the requirement for on-site property managers living on the premises, which the city attorney confirmed had been removed from the ordinance. This stipulation had been a point of contention, with some commissioners questioning its necessity and impact on operations.

Vice Mayor Kelley, who had originally sponsored the ordinance, acknowledged the challenges in balancing regulatory measures with the needs of property owners. He highlighted ongoing safety concerns within apartment complexes.

The meeting concluded with a motion to approve the ordinance as amended, which passed unanimously. However, there was a consensus among commissioners for continued dialogue on the matter. Plans were made for a workshop to further analyze data related to apartment complexes in Opa-Locka.