The most notable discussion centered on the proposed project on Pastorn Lane, where plans for a building addition and driveway location were reviewed. The project, which had received prior approval in 2015, required a fresh application due to the expiration of the original order of conditions. The construction plans include the addition of a garage with an upper room while keeping the existing building’s footprint unchanged. Given the location within a 100-foot buffer zone and riverfront area, environmental protection measures such as a siltation fence and straw wattles were proposed to safeguard the wetlands during construction.

During the meeting, a representative for the project detailed the plans to address the slope adjacent to the construction site. The commission discussed the proposed planting of shrubs, ultimately deciding against it due to potential harm from the steep drop-off. The dialogue underscored the importance of preventing encroachment into sensitive areas and maintaining the existing landscape. Members raised inquiries about construction specifics, such as the foundation type for the garage, which would be a frost wall with a slab floor, and the management of runoff. Visual aids, including site photographs, provided a clearer understanding of the topography and environmental challenges.

The commission reached a consensus on the next steps, emphasizing the importance of protecting the surrounding wetlands and riverfront area.

In another major agenda item, the commission reviewed a notice of intent for a retaining wall repair on Pitchburg Road, near the Squanook River. The proposed work aims to replace an existing wall with a structure using modern materials and techniques. The project team outlined plans to use concrete blocks with pinning and gluing methods, while the wall’s footprint would remain unchanged to avoid impacting the floodplain. Concerns about soil composition and stability were addressed, with plans to create a staging area and ensure proper drainage to prevent hydrostatic pressure.

Environmental implications were a key focus, with discussions on the delineation of wetland boundaries and the potential impact on the 200-foot riverfront area. Visual aids supported the application, and the commission sought clarity on wetland flags and their representation in plans. The team presented alternatives, including a no-build option that was deemed impractical. Instead, maintaining the existing wall with modern materials was considered the most effective solution to prevent future erosion and flooding issues.

The meeting also touched on the permitting process, which was contingent on obtaining feedback from the state. The absence of a file number meant no permits could be issued during the meeting, prompting a request for continuance to the next meeting on December 10th. The commission underscored the need for further deliberation and thorough discussion before moving forward.

The contractor’s role in determining equipment needs and managing the construction process was highlighted, with an emphasis on minimizing environmental impact.