The commission is working to update the Community Forestry Management Plan, a process required every five years. It was noted that a consultant had been hired to assist with this update, and a draft of the plan was anticipated soon. However, the timeline for the stakeholder meeting, initially planned for two weeks after receiving the draft, sparked concerns due to its proximity to the Thanksgiving holiday. Members agreed that a meeting in December would be more feasible, with suggestions leaning towards the week of December 17, to allow adequate time for review and public notice.

Ensuring community involvement in the CFMP process was a priority, with discussions highlighting the need for public engagement and council representation during the stakeholder meeting. The commission emphasized the importance of relaying feedback and recommendations effectively to the governing body. There was also acknowledgment that budgetary considerations would need to align with recommendations from the CFMP, including allocations for tree planting and other initiatives.

The urgency of approving the CFMP-related budget for the first year was addressed. Members recognized the need for specific budgetary allocations and realistic financial planning to meet the plan’s goals. Communication with consultants was emphasized to confirm the draft’s expected delivery.

The commission also delved into the responsibilities for managing trees in the right of way, noting the financial implications for the township’s budget. Members discussed the necessity of presenting clear information to the council to advocate for increased funding. A member highlighted the current ordinance stating township responsibility for tree maintenance, yet observed that homeowners were shouldering costs and responsibilities, causing confusion. A proposal was made to gather information from neighboring municipalities about their practices, potentially expanding the inquiry to include incentives for tree planting on private property.

Concerns were raised about planting trees within existing sidewalks and curbs, with members describing limited space for planting and potential navigational hazards. The commission discussed past initiatives where trees were planted without adequate care, resulting in issues like raised sidewalks and unmanageable growth. There was a call for better planning and execution to learn from previous experiences and avoid creating new problems.

Community involvement was further highlighted when a resident expressed concern over tree removals on Rosland Drive. The commission linked this sentiment to the importance of tree management and safety, particularly regarding the township’s tree ordinance, which mandates permits for removing healthy trees. Members discussed public frustration over tree removal, especially with construction projects where tree loss is often collateral.

Financial aspects of tree removal were debated, with some members noting that fees for permits in other towns can be substantial. The commission expressed a desire to use funds from tree removals to enhance the township’s canopy by planting new trees in areas needing more greenery. They emphasized the need for mapping the town to determine where trees can help mitigate flooding and reduce heat islands.