A primary focus of the meeting was the application for property modifications on Valley Court, where the council engaged in a discussion about proposed additions and alterations. The applicant sought approval for a 400-square-foot addition to the existing ranch-style home, intending to enhance the utility of the space. The property had previously seen the removal of a large pool, patio, and pool house, which reduced impervious coverage by approximately 1,800 square feet. The proposed addition aimed to maintain architectural consistency with the neighborhood, which consists predominantly of single-family ranch homes.

The applicant requested variances for building and impervious coverage, arguing that the net impervious coverage would still be less than before the pool’s removal. The board was particularly interested in ensuring that stormwater management measures were included, given the project’s location. Calculations were requested to determine the size of the required stormwater management tank, and assurances were given that these would be addressed in compliance with regulations.

The council also scrutinized the non-conforming conditions, namely the existing family room’s intrusion into the required rear yard setback. It was agreed that formalizing this condition in the resolution would prevent future complications with variance requests.

Another major topic was the application for modifications on Cotch Peak Avenue, where the applicants proposed converting a garage into additional living space to accommodate a family member with severe physical disabilities. This application sparked a debate about the town’s strict regulations on maintaining two-car garages. While the proposed plans exceeded the impervious coverage limit slightly, the applicants emphasized the need for an accessible living arrangement that aligned with the neighborhood’s character.

Concerns were raised about the legality of the garage conversion, as it was noted that construction had begun without clear approval. The council was divided over whether to allow the conversion to proceed, considering the strong precedent for preserving two-car garages. Some members expressed frustration at the apparent completion of construction that did not align with approved plans.

The council eventually approved the application, contingent upon several conditions, including updated plans reflecting the discussed changes and soil movement calculations.

In addition to these property discussions, the meeting addressed the extension of a previously approved application for an addition on Walnut Street. The applicant cited delays in securing a contractor and financing as reasons for the extension request. The council unanimously approved a one-year extension, facilitating the expedited processing of the engineer’s report necessary for construction to commence.