The board’s deliberations on Old Harbor Road revolved around its potential conversion for affordable housing, a topic that has sparked division both on the board and within the community. The property, historically designated for municipal use, was subject to a legal review to determine if restrictions from a 1971 bequest were still enforceable. Legal opinions varied, with some members advocating for a cautious approach, mindful of the original donor’s intentions, while others pushed for progress in addressing housing shortages.

The town’s attorney reviewed the legal landscape, emphasizing that certain restrictions might last only 30 years unless tied to public purposes like conservation or affordable housing. However, the absence of a clear deed and the potential designation of the property for a playground have complicated board discussions. The board’s members expressed differing views on whether to respect the town meeting’s prior approval for housing development or to heed legal advice suggesting that the restrictions might have expired.

In an effort to move forward, the board considered allocating $15,000 for design guidelines to explore potential housing options, including the rehabilitation of existing structures. Public comments underscored the importance of aligning future development with community character while addressing the pressing demand for affordable housing. The board acknowledged the historical significance of the property and the need for public input, leading to an ongoing debate about the property’s future.

While the housing discussion took center stage, the meeting also addressed water management and infrastructure improvements. The board reviewed strategies to enhance water conservation and protect water resources amid ongoing drought conditions. The Department of Public Works (DPW) reported on its initiatives, including educational outreach and stormwater management, to safeguard natural ecosystems and comply with environmental regulations.

Adjustmentsttention was devoted to the town’s pump stations, with discussions focusing on their design and integration into local neighborhoods. The board considered ways to minimize their visual impact, using landscaping and signage adjustments to better align with community aesthetics. The necessity of community engagement in the design process was emphasized, given the projected increase in the number of pump stations.

In addition to infrastructure concerns, the meeting addressed proposed fee increases by the Parks and Recreation Department. Public comments revealed concerns over the impact of these increases on local businesses, particularly community-based fitness programs. The board recognized the need to balance fiscal responsibilities with accessibility to community services, leading to a decision to revisit the fee structure for further consideration.

A proposal to streamline meeting procedures through a consent agenda was also debated. Board members weighed the benefits of efficiency against the need for transparency and accountability. While some members advocated for a consent agenda to expedite routine approvals, others emphasized the importance of direct communication with applicants during public meetings.