The primary focus of the meeting was Hartman’s application to replace an existing garage with a larger structure, measuring 24 feet by 26 feet, intended to store two passenger vehicles. Attorney Nancy O’Neal, representing Hartman, emphasized that the proposed garage would comply with local ordinances, addressing concerns about its height and setback. She argued that the new garage would enhance the property’s appearance and help alleviate parking congestion by increasing off-street parking availability. The proposal was presented as a departure from typical requests for reduced parking requirements.

However, the public hearing revealed a strong division among residents. Several community members, including John, expressed support for the project, noting his long-term familiarity with the neighborhood and willingness to address technical aspects of the construction. In contrast, opponents like Carol Healey and Richard voiced concerns. They argued that the garage’s increased dimensions would be incongruent with the surrounding area, characterized by summer cottages and small family homes. They stressed that the expansion would lead to a loss of green space, create a row of closely packed buildings, and potentially obstruct sunlight and views for neighboring properties.

Further concerns were raised about the potential use of the garage for commercial vehicles, such as oil trucks, which are known to park on nearby roads, creating navigation hazards. This sparked a broader discussion on ongoing parking issues in Oak Island and Woodland Road, with participants questioning the rationale behind needing a two-car garage for what is currently a rental property. The board members acknowledged these concerns, emphasizing that the construction would maintain compliance with setback requirements and would not encroach further into the yard than the existing structure.

To address these issues, the board proposed several restrictions on the garage’s use. These included prohibiting commercial vehicle parking, limiting the garage door height to 9 feet to prevent potential commercial use, and ensuring the structure would not serve as a living space. The standard restrictions were also reiterated, such as the requirement for the variance to be exercised within one year and the necessity for site plan review approval before obtaining a building permit.

Despite these measures, the decision to grant the variance was not unanimous. The board’s roll call vote revealed dissent, with Chairman Tucker casting a vote against the proposal. The variance was ultimately approved with the conditions outlined.

In addition to the garage variance discussion, the meeting touched on broader urban development issues in Oak Island, noting increased residential density and the prevalence of accessory apartment construction. These changes underscore the evolving landscape of the community and the challenges that come with balancing growth with existing neighborhood characteristics.