One of the issues that stirred public reaction was the council’s handling of budget transfers. A resident questioned the rationale behind a reduction in the property maintenance salary and an increase in other budget line items, including beautification and planning board expenses. The council explained these adjustments as routine year-end transfers, necessitated by various projects, such as the retaining wall on Hilltop Terrace, which required additional input from the planning board and borough engineer. The discussion also revealed that the shade tree budget had increased due to costs associated with removing dead ash trees over the past three years.

Further budget concerns were raised about the significant increase in streets and roads salaries, attributed to overtime work necessitated by severe winter weather. The animal patrol budget also saw an increase, which the council justified as necessary for repairs at the animal shelter. Despite these explanations, the resident remained dissatisfied, particularly with the perceived lack of transparency in the budget adjustments.

The meeting’s public comment segment also highlighted a heated discussion regarding the Federal Hill housing development project. A commenter, who was previously involved in a lawsuit related to the project, sought to clarify their position amidst accusations from some council members. They explained that while they were a main plaintiff in the lawsuit filed by the committee to save Federal Hill, the action was not intended to completely halt development but rather to prevent quarrying on the site. The lawsuit was filed months before the council’s establishment of an affordable housing zoning district, and the individual expressed frustration over allegations that their actions caused financial losses and legal expenses for the borough.

The commenter further criticized the protracted negotiations with the housing developer, which resulted in increased project density and a reduced financial contribution to the borough—from an expected $10 million to $4 million. They argued that these developments had not effectively advanced the project, leaving residents concerned about the long-term implications for the community.

In response to these concerns, a council member questioned the legality of implementing rent control measures to address rising rents in the community. A resident had urged the council to consider such measures to protect families amidst financial instability and medical challenges. The council member expressed uncertainty about the feasibility of rent control in New Jersey but promised to investigate further.

Other notable discussions during the meeting included updates on community initiatives and events. The Bloomingdale search and rescue team received praise for their response in a recent hiking incident. The council also encouraged residents to sign up for the RAVE emergency notification system and provided information on upcoming rabies vaccination clinics.

Community engagement was further emphasized through initiatives led by local organizations, focusing on food drives and toy donations as the holiday season approaches. A fundraising breakfast at Applebee’s and a “fill the fleet” toy collection event were announced, with the council encouraging community participation and support.