A significant portion of the meeting focused on a proposal for the EDA to assume management of River Park. This transfer would empower the EDA to handle inquiries from developers interested in the park’s open lots, streamlining the process by allowing the EDA to evaluate proposals before forwarding them to the city council. Concerns were raised about whether this change might slow down land sales due to necessary public hearings. However, it was suggested that the EDA could conduct these hearings during their meetings, potentially expediting the process by eliminating the need for separate council hearings. Members emphasized the necessity of coordinating with planning and zoning administrators to ensure compliance with zoning regulations. This collaborative approach was highlighted as essential for effectively managing land use and fostering economic growth in Oronoco.

Alongside this, the EDA is nearing the completion of a city branding project. Members reviewed the final two branding options, with voting scheduled from December 1 to December 31. The selected brand will be unveiled on the city website in January. To facilitate this process, a webpage and flyers for voting will be created, with both online and physical voting options available at city hall. Discussions revolved around ensuring only residents could vote, addressing concerns about non-residents potentially participating through local businesses. While some loopholes were acknowledged, confidence was expressed in the integrity of the voting process.

The meeting also delved into discussions about city-owned lots, including their potential sale or development. Members considered issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for developers interested in these properties. It was suggested that a comprehensive list of available properties be compiled to provide clarity to developers. Discussions also touched on the possibility of selling the lots outright or developing them, with considerations about compatibility with existing neighborhoods and covenant adherence.

In a related vein, the potential development of River Park land was explored, with members expressing varied opinions on whether to maintain green spaces or pursue housing developments. Financial implications of maintaining undeveloped land were noted, with some members advocating for recreational facilities such as pickleball courts instead of residential housing. The idea of holding a public information meeting was suggested to gauge community interest and ideas for the land.

Additionally, the meeting covered logistical topics, including scheduling the next meeting for December 22nd at 5:30 PM and discussing potential changes to regular meeting times to better accommodate members’ schedules. A humorous exchange about meeting times and calendar peculiarities added levity to the proceedings, highlighting the collaborative atmosphere among members and their commitment to community input and logistical considerations.